E Borders and your MP

doris

Well-Known Member
Joined
19 Jun 2001
Messages
2,266
Location
London
Visit site
I posted this on the last eborders thread but it will probably get lost there. I do feel we should all bang on our MPs on this, probably won't do any good but there is just a chance.....

As I struggled through the whole eborders thread I nicked a few bits and sent the following to my MP Greg Hands. Greg is a shadow Treasury minister and will be expecting a middle level goernment role should his lot win the election. I do feel that the more MPs get kicked about this the more they are likely to get nervous about staying with a scheme which can only pi$$ people off, cost money and achieve zip.

Hi Greg

The whole question of the implementation of the E Borders project lurches from plain incompetent planning to bizarre promotion. The forcing of this system onto leisure boating is alienating so many people who are, by nature and instinct, supporters of law and order that it will finish up as yet another huge and expensive government disaster.

The problem with finding computer solutions is that the efficiency of the solution is entirely dependant on the quality of the definition of the problem. If you don't understand the problem (& they clearly don't) then it is simply a case of "Garbage In = Garbage Out" - remember that ?

At the London Boat Show the UKBA have a stand. Sadly the staff seem to be shipped in simply to press the flesh as, in their own admission, they have little or no knowledge of the scheme.

Do you remember games in the Defence world called DERA and the F.I.S.T. (Future Infantry Soldier Technology) project? I remember a great TV expose 20 years ago (panorama) where a junior minister expounded confidently about how great this (then simulated) system would be for the soldier, integrating microwave TV, radio comms, gps, etc., into an integrated battlefield system. They also interviewed the chief designer, a slightly mad bloke who admitted he'd been inspired by the kit they had in the ALIENS movie, and wondered if they could do the same.... Not surprisngly, it couldn't and didn't work, and the project was scrapped

Now it seems that the entire Eborders thing is another example of the same, a theoretically wonderful (if you're a Security wonk) way of sieving out the nasty guys from the rest, and all sounds great and easy on paper. I think that Serco took the theory to a junior minister in need of a Headline project, and oversold their capacity to deliver whilst not actually having a clue about the real parameters of the "problem". Having seen some of this administration working from the inside, is it any wonder that this project is in the mess that it is?

Did you hear the chap on the radio the other morning? German, thick accent, saying something along the lines of 'The trouble with England is that they apply the letter of the law so firmly. In Germany and other places on the continent we are sensible about how we use the laws to guide us'

Last time I bought this up you stated the a conservative government supports this plan. If this is still the case, may I quote you? It is the subject of a great deal of comment in the boating fraternity, particularly as it appears that the implementation is about to be bought forward to next year. You can probably gather that I have yet to encounter any article or internet posting that expresses a view that this scheme will either work at all or even scratch the surface of the problem. Are you listening, as a Shadow Minister, or are you chaps going to repeat all the cock ups of the last 12 years.

Best regards
 
The trouble with letters like that is that roughly translated it simply says 'I think it is a waste of time and won't work'. the MP will put it in the bin. What would be more effective is to give well researched and supported reasons exactly why it won't work, and how much money it will cost.
 
Eborders and your MP

As it happens I wrote to my MP - Brian Jenkins, and he has sent me a reply from somebody in the Home Office which sounds encouraging. Unfortunately I don't have the letter with me but will add the relevant text when I can.

That said, one of the things that bothers me is that anti-terrorist legislation is being used to harrass people taking innocent photographs in the street. I gather the same legislation was used to arrest an elderly heckler at the Labour Party conference and to take action against Icelandic banks. So the intentions of the people enacting the legislation may be entirely honourable but when it gets into the hands of the people enforcing it, the whole thing can turn very nasty.
 
That said, one of the things that bothers me is that anti-terrorist legislation is being used to harrass people taking innocent photographs in the street. I gather the same legislation was used to arrest an elderly heckler at the Labour Party conference and to take action against Icelandic banks. So the intentions of the people enacting the legislation may be entirely honourable but when it gets into the hands of the people enforcing it, the whole thing can turn very nasty.

Old hat. EU slaps Noo Laboors wrist. http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/8453878.stm And Home Office has warned police forces that street photography is perfectly legal.

But, they've known that for years, but it still doesn't stop the little Hitlers. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RKl2sEN4yNM
 
The trouble with letters like that is that roughly translated it simply says 'I think it is a waste of time and won't work'. the MP will put it in the bin. What would be more effective is to give well researched and supported reasons exactly why it won't work, and how much money it will cost.

He has to at least reply and that gives you something to slap him round the head with come election time. There is about to be a huge influx of new MPs. Write to the aspiring ones as well, they will be v keen to be seen to be working for the electorate.

If you have time to 'give well researched and supported reasons ' terrific, but every little nag helps.
 
He has to at least reply
No he doesn't: he simply has to get his secretary to sign on his behalf a standard letter that says "thank you for your letter which is receiving attention.

In any case, it has almost nothing to do with MPs. The whole e-borders thing is based on Secondary legislation -- which means it is devised by civil servants and rubberstamped by puppet ministers who may or may not have the foggiest idea what it's all about, without any parliamentary scrutiny at all

The "primary legislation" that allows the e-borders is the 1971 Immigration Act, where it says:-
(9) “Passenger information” means such information relating to the passengers carried, or expected to be carried, by the ship or aircraft as may be specified.
(9A) “Service information” means such information relating to the voyage or flight undertaken by the ship or aircraft as may be specified.
(10) “Specified” means specified in an order made by statutory instrument by the Secretary of State.
It may well be that -- back in 1971 -- no-one envisaged that this innocent-looking sentence might be used in this way. This abuse of the Secondary legislation system for our elected representatives to abdicate power to the civil service is relatively new -- but it is a very real problem.
Secondary legislation now accounts for 99% of all new laws.
 
The trouble with letters like that is that roughly translated it simply says 'I think it is a waste of time and won't work'. the MP will put it in the bin. What would be more effective is to give well researched and supported reasons exactly why it won't work, and how much money it will cost.

It is very hard to see how you can make a well researched argument when they won't say how the scheme will work in practice (Just that it will all be OK have faith) and then change the criteria, "Now its all going to be voluntary for EU citizens" in the meantime they continue making plans for implementation of the law that as already been passed.

Hopefully the original post by MoodySabre will prove to be right and the scheme will be implemented in a sensible way, however the conflicting information and statements from UKBA do give rise for concern IMHO.
 
I promised to provide info following my letter to my MP. He passed my letter to Meg Hillier who is apparently Parliamentary Under Secretary of State responsible for e-Borders. He has now passed her reply to me. In part it reads: "Furthermore, we recognise that sailing is a dynamic activity and that wind, tide and weather can cause plans to alter at any time. ...leisure craft and working boat operators will be expected to supply [specified information] on a best endeavours basis. ...there is no expectation or requirement that this would be done while the vessel is at sea."

As I said earlier, that's fine but how will the law be used by UKBA personnel, some of whom seem to be adopting a very gung-ho attitude?

The one thing that I haven't seen mentioned so far is that when I went on a cross-channel trip early in 2009 the skipper had to provide passport details etc ona form and hand it in at the marina office. I got the impression that this was standard practice. Does this mean that the only thing that is changing is that skippers will have to provide the information electronically?
 
I promised to provide info following my letter to my MP. He passed my letter to Meg Hillier who is apparently Parliamentary Under Secretary of State responsible for e-Borders. He has now passed her reply to me. In part it reads: "Furthermore, we recognise that sailing is a dynamic activity and that wind, tide and weather can cause plans to alter at any time. ...leisure craft and working boat operators will be expected to supply [specified information] on a best endeavours basis. ...there is no expectation or requirement that this would be done while the vessel is at sea."

As I said earlier, that's fine but how will the law be used by UKBA personnel, some of whom seem to be adopting a very gung-ho attitude?

The one thing that I haven't seen mentioned so far is that when I went on a cross-channel trip early in 2009 the skipper had to provide passport details etc ona form and hand it in at the marina office. I got the impression that this was standard practice. Does this mean that the only thing that is changing is that skippers will have to provide the information electronically?

[The one thing that I haven't seen mentioned so far is that when I went on a cross-channel trip early in 2009 the skipper had to provide passport details etc ona form and hand it in at the marina office. I got the impression that this was standard practice. Does this mean that the only thing that is changing is that skippers will have to provide the information electronically?]

that isnt std practice.
the only folk who know i am going Foriegn are my rellies & friends & those of my crew.
i dont inform the GC either
 
Spying on us

I ythink the only people who know where my boat (and I) is/are are my bank and, if they are observant, the credit card company and O2.
If you are a live-aboard yottie, you are like the arch-typical mushroom, kept in the dark and fed on s**t. The best way is to keep the British gestapo and their gauleiters also in the dark, and if you do have to return to UK, do not worry. They may act nasty but their powers are limited.
Of course, it would be better if you had a different coloured skin; then you would be immune from everything.
 
write to e boarders

write to e boarders anonymously to say that you think you mp is smuggling (dont have to say he/ shes an MP)
(some of them probably do ) and hope some of them get searched next time they go abroad (hopefully full body !)

wouldnt work in practice but if it did it would give joe jublic a lot of pleasure
 
Top