MarkJohnson12345
Well-Known Member
On my recent cruising holiday, I called the coast guard three times in four days using DSC to report my passage plan.
Each time I had a different response.
The procedure is to call the MMSI number of the coast guard, and wait for the response. I then acknowledge the response by pressing the 'Enter' button.
So far so good
The first time, having pressed the enter button I waited for the CG to call me me. Nothing happened for several minutes. So I did a verbal call on Ch16 then reported the passage plan on Ch67, and asked why the unexpected response to the DSC call. The GG said that they were waiting for me to call them.
The second time I called, once I had acknowledged their DSC response, I immediatley verbally called them on Ch67. I then found that they were talking to someone else! I waited for that conversation to end, and repeated my call to them saying that I was the DSC caller. I reported my passage plan with no problems.
The third time (2 days later) having gone through the initial procedure, and I had acknowledged their DSC reponse, the CG reponded so quickly to the 'DSC caller', and the passage plan was reported succesfully.
I have a certificate for use of the DSC radio, a course done about two years ago.
My point is that I am not sure what is the correct procedure when calling the coast guard. When calling verbally, we always wait for him to come back on Ch67 before carrying a passage plan report or whatever.
Not sure that the coast guard was sure either!
I assumed that their computer system would instantly recognise my MMSI number and they would e able to respond to 'Triton'. But I suspect that the coast guard has no idea who is calling them, just a number on their radio/computer system. Thus it must be a little difficult for them to return the call when busy. My Swansea Coast guard returns my call by saying 'Boat calling with MMSI number ********' a little complicated if you ask me, especially as I don't readily recognise my own MMSI number.
great system, but it does not yet seem to be implemented properly.
But what government agency has yet succesfully spent their millions on working computer system??????
Each time I had a different response.
The procedure is to call the MMSI number of the coast guard, and wait for the response. I then acknowledge the response by pressing the 'Enter' button.
So far so good
The first time, having pressed the enter button I waited for the CG to call me me. Nothing happened for several minutes. So I did a verbal call on Ch16 then reported the passage plan on Ch67, and asked why the unexpected response to the DSC call. The GG said that they were waiting for me to call them.
The second time I called, once I had acknowledged their DSC response, I immediatley verbally called them on Ch67. I then found that they were talking to someone else! I waited for that conversation to end, and repeated my call to them saying that I was the DSC caller. I reported my passage plan with no problems.
The third time (2 days later) having gone through the initial procedure, and I had acknowledged their DSC reponse, the CG reponded so quickly to the 'DSC caller', and the passage plan was reported succesfully.
I have a certificate for use of the DSC radio, a course done about two years ago.
My point is that I am not sure what is the correct procedure when calling the coast guard. When calling verbally, we always wait for him to come back on Ch67 before carrying a passage plan report or whatever.
Not sure that the coast guard was sure either!
I assumed that their computer system would instantly recognise my MMSI number and they would e able to respond to 'Triton'. But I suspect that the coast guard has no idea who is calling them, just a number on their radio/computer system. Thus it must be a little difficult for them to return the call when busy. My Swansea Coast guard returns my call by saying 'Boat calling with MMSI number ********' a little complicated if you ask me, especially as I don't readily recognise my own MMSI number.
great system, but it does not yet seem to be implemented properly.
But what government agency has yet succesfully spent their millions on working computer system??????