Disagreement on a serious thread

BlueSkyNick

Active member
Joined
29 Apr 2003
Messages
11,766
Location
Near a marina, sailing club and pub
Visit site
Becky started what became one of the most emotional threads I have seen on the forum - certainly bought a tear to my eye, for very personal reasons.

Claymore added a lighthearted post, which was his own way of expressing himself.

Brendan has criticised him for doing this, and spoiling a nice thread. He has also said Claymore should have stared a new one if he disagreed.

Well, I don't want to spoil Becky's thread any further so here we are on this one - I think you are over-reacting Brendan.

Everybody grieves in their own way. To some, many in fact, the lighthearted approach is best. This might be difficult for others to understand but that doesn't make it bad. There is no right or wrong way - every individual deals with it differently.

So lets not spoil a really good thread by telling other people how to behave on forum, or by starting an argument within it.

Hope you don't mind the feedback - no hard feelings.
 

snowleopard

Active member
Joined
16 May 2001
Messages
33,645
Location
Oxford
Visit site
i thought all threads were fair game to be hijacked by in-jokes these days. perhaps it's best to restrict serious debate to PBO or Liveaboard. i have recently discovered the 'ignore' option but unfortunately it only suppresses the text, not the whole message.
 

graham

Well-known member
Joined
16 May 2001
Messages
8,101
Visit site
I didnt find Claymores post at all offensive,To my mind it was an attempt to lighten up what was a very heavy and emotional thread.

I attended the funeral of a respected work colleague recently taken far to young from his friends and family.

Before the service everyone was very subdued but outside after a bit the normal banter was beginning to come back ,life goes on.

Having said that Brendan has every right to disagree with whoever or whatever he likes and to express his disagreement.

While we have no right to tell others how to grieve we also have no right to put pressure on people as to what they can and cant say on an open forum.

So personally I think Brendan was heavy handed in his condemnation of Claymores post but do we have any more of a mandate to critisize Brendan for expressing his opinion?
 

jimi

Well-known member
Joined
19 Dec 2001
Messages
28,660
Location
St Neots
Visit site
Yup , Brendan's a crabbit git and needs to lighten up, personally I think at midnight the sense of humour clock runs out and he gets all miserable cos all his really really miserable posts are in the early hours!
 

StugeronSteve

New member
Joined
29 Apr 2003
Messages
4,837
Location
Not always where I would like to be!
Visit site
Lifting the mood at any sombre time is a human instinct.

Claysie's comments were typically "Claysie", gentle experiential humour. I really can't remember Claymore posting anything with intent to offend anybody, other than jimi and para, of course. I am sure that if Becky had been upset by the post Claysie would waste no time in apologising.
 

Sgeir

Well-known member
Joined
22 Nov 2004
Messages
14,791
Location
Stirling
s14.photobucket.com
I have no reason to disbelieve Claymore's account, particularly on the death of a parent. Nor did I think it distasteful, it was just an account of what happened. What's Brendan's problem with it - the Victoria Plums? Don't know what all the fuss is about.

Many other people have had similar or, occasionally funny, or sometimes odd experiences with the ashes of close relatives or friends. Doesn't make them bad people.

Brendan's said his piece. I think he's overreacted, but there you go. Doesn't make him a bad person either.
 

aitchw

New member
Joined
18 Feb 2002
Messages
2,453
Location
West Yorkshire, UK
Visit site
I don't believe either post did much harm.

Claymore's reminiscence is quite understandable and reflective of a natural human response to reminders of our own times of loss. Brendan found it grated with his sensibilities and posted a not too vigorous chide.

Neither has spoiled the sensitive and concerned tone of the thread and I'm sure Becky will have been heartened by the support.

As an aside to Claymore's comments, my own father-in-law's ashes are under several apple trees in the garden of a place dear to his heart. He would be happy to know the potash was doing some good.
 

snowleopard

Active member
Joined
16 May 2001
Messages
33,645
Location
Oxford
Visit site
Ignore option

if another user gets on your wick, click on his ID and select 'Ignore this user' subsequently his posts only appear as

*** You are ignoring this user ***

when viewing threads in flat mode.
 

Stingo

Well-known member
Joined
17 Oct 2001
Messages
13,814
Location
Getting drunk with your daughter
Visit site
Re: Ignore option

[ QUOTE ]
I wonder if it tells the 'ignoree' that somebody has selected the option, so they can return the compliment! /forums/images/graemlins/smile.gif

[/ QUOTE ]
Why don't you and Brendan try it then?
 

claymore

Well-known member
Joined
18 Jun 2001
Messages
10,635
Location
In the far North
Visit site
Oops

Well - I've already explained myself on Becky's original thread so if you want to look - its there. I did that before reading this one. Thanks for your support - you all got it as it was intended and apologies to Brendan for any offense caused.
 

Woodentop

New member
Joined
20 Nov 2004
Messages
330
Visit site
Claymore was not wrong.

I find your post perfectly reasonable.

Claymore may have been telling the absolute truth but was castigated for inappropriate levity.

When my father was buried the coffin was too big for the hole in the ground.
We pissed ourselves laughing, as they struggled to stuff him in. A delightfully happy moment on a sad day.

Unfortunately life throws jokes at you at the "wrong" moment.

I support you and Claymore. Grief can have some very odd aspects.
 

Romeo

Well-known member
Joined
14 Aug 2002
Messages
5,030
Location
Forth
Visit site
Re: Oops

a touching reconcilliation. Messers Ferguson and Wenger should be referred to this thread to see how it is done.
 
Top