MedDreamer
Well-Known Member
As Captain Mainwaring would say "Well spotted Wilson, I was wondering who would point that out..........ahmmm....as you were, men" 
Do you mean sight gauges, assuming that the tanks have them?Alternatively look at the fuel tank gauges
Yes I did mean sight gauges, the reading on the dial gauges I had changed just by switching the engines on!Do you mean sight gauges, assuming that the tanks have them?
Because if you hope to spot such difference on dial gauges - genny aside - there are only two words I can think of: good luck!
Why? Actually the suggestion as such makes a lot of sense, if sight gauges are available (something I'm not sure about on F'rettis).overall my suggestions were pointless!! I'll shut up.........
the rpm is measured from the ecm so there is no tacho to calibrate, if speed sensor was faulty its unlikely engine will start
Sat Dome is KVH Tracvision G4 which means nothing to me. Is that OK? $64k question is will I be able to watch England beat Italy in the World Cup Final in July whilst loafing on my boat?
Btw if this deal goes through, it looks like my stay in Sardinia is short lived as the F53 is based in N Adriatic and I'd certainly want to 'do' Istria and Dalmation Islands whilst I'm there
1. What HOURs are on each engine? has one done more than the other - you dont say
2. Is there a exrtra piece of equipment on one of the engines, a high output alternator, hydraulic pump or similar that's not on the orther one?
3. Is the hot water calorifier connected to only one engine?
These are the sort of things I would look at to try and explain small differences like the ones you describe. WHY? Because the throttle opening of each engine is difficult to access, just because each engine is doing the same RPM it doesnt mean they are both producing the same amount of power. The differences in the power required from each engine to achieve the same RPM would explain the small differences in the reading you have obtained.
Why does material like that get said in PMs when this forum is about information sharing?
I completely agree your general point PY that differences should be in the order of 1-2 litres/hour. Engineers aren't so bad that they make engines 10% different
Won't I get Sky from the Astra ? satellite in N Adriatic. I know Sardinia and Balearics are problematic for that satellite
Mike, what speed did the boat reach at WOT?
2330 rpm and a load below 100% on both engines would lead to think that BOTH props are slightly short.
Anyway, I still think that the weird numbers are on port engine.
The "peak" at 2190 doesn't make sense. Regardless of whether the props are optimally tuned or not, the "prop demand" consumption curves MUST steadily increase, tending to match the "max power" consumption curves at WOT and max rpm.
Besides, even a rough multiplication of the rated max consumption (125 l/h @ 2300 with 100% load) by the 93% load of stbd engine gives exactly the 117 reported, whilst the same calculation on port engine gives 119, instead of the 101 reported.
I know that electronics are generally reliable these days, but if max speed is fine I would tend to think that there is simply a faulty consumption reading on port engine for some reason.
You might be interested to look at Cat specs for further details.
Also check this out on those model engines with Cat prior to purchase as there were some probs with intercoolers and is public knowledge if you do a search!
This is a snippet from the internet:
I haven't yet seen the final class notice. Revision 2 of the class notice states: "You are receiving this notice because you have been identified as an individual or entity that has been an owner of a boat with a Caterpillar engine, including a 3196, C-12 or other Caterpillar engine, containing the aftercooler model numbers in issue".
"Plaintiff is pursuing this action on behalf of himself and all other persons who own or at any time owned a boat powered by a Caterpillar marine engine equipped with any version of aftercooler model/part numbers 138-2571, 161-9898, 210-5631, and 216-5147". Aftercooler serial number: 216-5147-04 is the latest of eight iterations.
Assuming the boat has seperate fuel tanks, is it worth asking the current owner if he keeps a log of how much fuel each tank takes when filling up? If its consistent with the data reading then its a real issue, if the amount of fuel per tank is similar its an instrument problem.
Alternatively look at the fuel tank gauges now (assuming not full). No-one part fills one tank so if they show a difference consistent with the 10% anomoly then it looks real
Apologies if this is too simplistic to be useful Mike but just ways that non techies like me would seek to verify the data.
jfm, to be fair to PY, I have PM'd him in the past a couple of times because I know he has specific experience of the F53
As far as we (UK TV viewers) are concerned, Astra is split as follows:-
Astra North beam
Astra South beam
Astra 2D - UK focussed beam
Sky mainly transmit on the Astra North and South beams which cover the whole of Europe. So AFAIK virtually all the Sky channels should be available to you in either the Western Med or the Adriatic - even with the smaller 40cm dish.
The big issue that we all moan about is that BBC, ITV, Channel 4 and 5 only transmit on the Astra 2D UK beam. This is specifically focussed at the UK only and the signals get weak outside the beam so that by the time you get to the northern coasts of the Med, you need about a metre dia dish to receive the signals transmitted on Astra 2D.
Do tell! Via VPN tunnelling, or what? You'll surely use a 3G French provider (thus with a non-UK IP address) from SoF, dontcha?I've used 3G a lot to watch BBC stuff and it works fine.
Do tell! Via VPN tunnelling, or what? You'll surely use a 3G French provider (thus with a non-UK IP address) from SoF, dontcha?