Depth, trans and afoul?

Clyde_Wanderer

New member
Joined
15 Jun 2006
Messages
2,829
Location
Glasgow
Visit site
Was reading the manual for my Nasa clipper depth, says not to antifoul hull below transducer.
Does that mean just one meal worth of barnicals in a small round area of the hull at the end of the season, or do our forumites just AF below theirs?
 

Heigaro

New member
Joined
13 Oct 2006
Messages
832
Location
Adlington, Cheshire
Visit site
I run my NASA Clipper sounder with the old Seafarer transducer which had years of antifouling over it and had no problems - I'm pleased to say. /forums/images/graemlins/smile.gif
 

alienzdive

New member
Joined
4 Jan 2005
Messages
457
Location
London
Visit site
Although unlikely the transducer companies can not guarantee that the chemicals in the antifoul will not disolve the plastics in the transducer. It is more there for the purpose of a disclaimer than any other reason.
 

nealeb

New member
Joined
4 May 2004
Messages
54
Visit site
I have used both NASA and Raymarine transducers in in-hull mounts and have always antifouled the hull underneath them with no apparent ill-effect on sensitivity. I would not AF a transducer if it were fitted through-hull, though.
 
Top