Baggywrinkle
Well-Known Member
I think I am reasonably qualified to say "bollocks" to that statement - and I now agree with @Caladh that you most probably are just trolling.On the chopping block. Funny how General motors, Ford's, Volkswagon, Toyota and most others have still failed to find a suitable replacement, and fit LA as original equipment.
If I had shares in LA batteries I would be hanging on for another decade.
For the benefit of anyone reading this thread who is wondering about the future of lead acid batteries, we (the automakers) do have replacements planned as, apart form LA batteries being crap for modern cars with large electrical systems, we have to respond to this ....
EU Battery Regulation 2023/1542: obligations and updates
The stipulation that LA batteries must contain 85% recycled lead in 2028 will have an negativre effect on LA lifetime cost - they are already a costly warranty item, and require an energy management system to prevent them getting too flat if the vehicle is not regularly driven, or is driven but in a "delivery vehicle" drive cycle, where the engine is continuously started and stopped, the vehicle is never switched off, and the time between start-stop cycles is short. This kills LA batteries as they can't be deeply discharged without risking warranty claims.
Another interesting fact, ever wondered why your car re-starts the engine at traffic lights for no reason? It's the energy management logic re-starting the engine to avoid battery drain. In vehicles with electric assisted steering, a tug on the wheel will also re-start the engine as this pushes the current draw high enough to require the alternator.
All auto manufacturers are continually evaluating the alternatives as we all have the same problems with LA.
The moment Li (or something else) becomes financially viable from a lifetime cost perspective will be the end of LA in cars, period - LA is not a great technology for modern cars.