D6-330 consumption in a 28 ft boat

Macce

New member
Joined
19 Jan 2025
Messages
3
Visit site
I have a new to me Nord Star 28 /D6-330DPH, which I bought last August. I had about 1,5 moths time to use it before winterizing it. It is year model 2010.

All good, but maths as comes to consumption, do not sum up. With half tank and some gear on, it tops 35,5 - 36 kn, which is as it should. At 2500 rpm.the speed is around 22,5 kn. Test reviews tell lowest planin speed consumption being in 1.3 - 1,4 l/nm range. Now, my measured average consumption was almost 1,8 l/nm, that even involves parts driving in displacement speeds. I was avoiding hanging in semi-planing speeds, mostly planing in 2500 -2700 rpm range, and when slow, always in the range of 1000-1300 rpm. With 1200 rpm or so, it should take no more than one litre /nm.

With my previous boats I was easily able to meet the reported test consumption rates. This time rpms match for both cruising and top speed, but the consumption is selveral 10% higher than tested by the magazines. Interestingly, I found two other owners reporting online exactly the same cruising fuel flow figures, 1,8 l/nm

Anyone here with the same engine and similar boat/speed range, what figures do you get? Or, can the (playsibly) elevated fluel consumption be a symptom of something odd hapening in the engine? Acceleration is good, no smoke, no vibrations. My previous boat, with D4 260 took around 1,1 l/nm average, similar top speed of 35 - 36 kn.
 

Macce

New member
Joined
19 Jan 2025
Messages
3
Visit site
Thanks Macanderson.

So it should be 27 ish liters per hour at 2500 rpm according to this. If 2500 rpm gives 22+ knots, it means sub 1,3 liters per nm. E.g. way lower compared to what I have. But that is "at calculated propeller load exp 2.5" whatever it means. What if the load differs?
 

Macce

New member
Joined
19 Jan 2025
Messages
3
Visit site
Yeah, I guess I need to do that to diminish my guesswork. First of all I need to cruise a bit more to get more miles and burn more fuel and look how the consumption looks like.
 

NBs

Active member
Joined
9 Nov 2017
Messages
331
Visit site
I'm thinking that your boat has more stuff that weighs vs a new test boat. Also, the underwater surface might be old antifoulig and rougher or slightly dirty vs new smooth antifoulig. From this difference in consumption and fuel measurement tolerance may vary, it is not an absolute truth.
 
Top