BobnLesley
Well-Known Member
Our yacht's fitted with a 10hp engine, traditional gearbox and a fixed three-bladed prop on the end of a 25mm/1" shaft; the shaft's clamped into the rear of the gearbox, passes though an oil-filled seal on white-metal bearings and then a white-plastic cutlass bearing at the stern - I can't remember what the material of this bearing's called, but it's supposedly 'self-lubricating'?
This cutlass bearing is OK, but needs replacing every other year and after six years, the shaft now shows significant wear at the bearing face and might well need replacing next time around: To be fair, the shaft/bearing are probably worked harder than most, as we might well average 200+ engine hours each year.
During a recent conversation with a chap from the Netherlands, who I believe to be a seriously good engineer - the 68' steel ketch that he's designed, built from scratch and lived on for the last fifteen years is testament to that - gave me some interesting points/advice:
•To work effectively, these self-lubricating bearings still ought to have some sea-water to help keep them cool, so they should at the very least have a few grooves filed into their inner face (mine are smooth) to ease the water's path into/out of the propellor tube.
•Even these grooves won't help much as the propellor's action causes a low-pressure area in the water immediately astern of the bearing, as a result most of the water which has percolated into the stern tube whilst sat on anchor will be slowly sucked out once the propellor begins turning and not replaced until the engine next stops.
•He suggested that active sea-water lubrication might help: - fit a 6mm/1/4" T junction into the flexible engine cooling water pipe just before the point where it connects into the exhaust elbow and tap a 6mm/1/4" connection into the propellor tube where it emerges into the engine bay (just astern of the existing oil-filled seal) then connect a hose between these new fittings which will then take a proportion of the expended engine cooling water out via the propellor bearing. Any comments/opinions on the suggestion? Whilst I can see the logic of the water lubrication, my biggest concern is that the modification might build up sufficient water pressure within the propellor tube, to force this injected engine cooling water forward too, past the the forward oil/water seals and into the oil filled shaft seal?
•Peter's other (and preferred) suggestion was to install a shaft bearing about 8mm shorter than the existing one and preferably of bronze, with a lipped oil seal installed astern of it, make the tap-in to the propellor tube as described above, but instead of connecting to the engine cooling system, fit a remote oil-filled header tank (similar to the one which pressurises the existing oil-filled shaft seal ahead of it) and then fill the whole propellor tube with oil. Any comments/opinions? My main concern with this proposal is that unless the shaft alignment is perfect (whilst Peter's undoubtably is, I doubt I could manage it) then any 'lash' in the propellor shaft would quickly destroy the new oil-seal at the stern leaving me with a bigger/more regular maintenance task than I have already; my own preference would be to continue using the nylon self-lubricating material still, that way, if the seal did fail, then I am not obliged to haul out for a replacement immediately.
Has anyone made/tried/considered any of these suggestions?
BobnLesley
This cutlass bearing is OK, but needs replacing every other year and after six years, the shaft now shows significant wear at the bearing face and might well need replacing next time around: To be fair, the shaft/bearing are probably worked harder than most, as we might well average 200+ engine hours each year.
During a recent conversation with a chap from the Netherlands, who I believe to be a seriously good engineer - the 68' steel ketch that he's designed, built from scratch and lived on for the last fifteen years is testament to that - gave me some interesting points/advice:
•To work effectively, these self-lubricating bearings still ought to have some sea-water to help keep them cool, so they should at the very least have a few grooves filed into their inner face (mine are smooth) to ease the water's path into/out of the propellor tube.
•Even these grooves won't help much as the propellor's action causes a low-pressure area in the water immediately astern of the bearing, as a result most of the water which has percolated into the stern tube whilst sat on anchor will be slowly sucked out once the propellor begins turning and not replaced until the engine next stops.
•He suggested that active sea-water lubrication might help: - fit a 6mm/1/4" T junction into the flexible engine cooling water pipe just before the point where it connects into the exhaust elbow and tap a 6mm/1/4" connection into the propellor tube where it emerges into the engine bay (just astern of the existing oil-filled seal) then connect a hose between these new fittings which will then take a proportion of the expended engine cooling water out via the propellor bearing. Any comments/opinions on the suggestion? Whilst I can see the logic of the water lubrication, my biggest concern is that the modification might build up sufficient water pressure within the propellor tube, to force this injected engine cooling water forward too, past the the forward oil/water seals and into the oil filled shaft seal?
•Peter's other (and preferred) suggestion was to install a shaft bearing about 8mm shorter than the existing one and preferably of bronze, with a lipped oil seal installed astern of it, make the tap-in to the propellor tube as described above, but instead of connecting to the engine cooling system, fit a remote oil-filled header tank (similar to the one which pressurises the existing oil-filled shaft seal ahead of it) and then fill the whole propellor tube with oil. Any comments/opinions? My main concern with this proposal is that unless the shaft alignment is perfect (whilst Peter's undoubtably is, I doubt I could manage it) then any 'lash' in the propellor shaft would quickly destroy the new oil-seal at the stern leaving me with a bigger/more regular maintenance task than I have already; my own preference would be to continue using the nylon self-lubricating material still, that way, if the seal did fail, then I am not obliged to haul out for a replacement immediately.
Has anyone made/tried/considered any of these suggestions?
BobnLesley