snooks
Well-Known Member
Last edited:
At present we are relying on the US military's account of how these unfortunate people met their death.
The case of Linda Norgrove comes to mind. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-highlands-islands-11900709 Initially the media were told that she had been shot by her captors during a rescue attempt. Only after a post mortem was it established that she was killed by a grenade thrown by the US troops attempting to rescue her. Several US troops were disciplined for trying to stop the truth coming out.
I suspect as much - why would they kill all hostages? Doesn't make sense
But the subsequent response by the US Navy in taking these pirates captive instead of sinking their boat with them on it, hardly sends out a tough message.
At present we are relying on the US military's account of how these unfortunate people met their death.
it sounds as if the crew had a concealed weapon, and decided to take their chances. It's a sad, very sad conclusion, and I wonder what the next stage in escalation by the US forces will be ? Pre-emptives by submarine ?
You cant chase a speedboat with a submarine!
Can you not?
They're noisy things, you can hear them a mile away with the unaided ear underwater, so a submarine can certainly follow them.
Top speeds of submarines aren't reliably published, but Teh Interwebs seem to reckon from 30 to upwards of 40 knots (possibly a bit overhyped).
Quick look with a periscope from astern (unlikely to be noticed by qatted-up pirates) to check what you're following.
Seems like the most likely problem is torpedoes not being designed to work against small boats - confused by their lack of bulk and draught and looking a lot like a wave trough which the torpedo is meant to avoid. But I'm sure they could be suitably reprogrammed by the manufacturer if required.
Pete