Neeves
Well-Known Member
timchapman;That is probably countered by increased growth in warmer waters. Coppercoat works for us as we don't have to replace it every year. But you can't get away from having to swim down and sponge it off. That's been the case for all anti foul we've used too.[/QUOTE said:Tim,
With my Scots heritage I can sympathise with the problem of what to do with old tins of AF, its costs so much it cannot be wasted.
We would fully agree with you antifouls (and even, by report, Coppercoat) benefit from a wipe down fairly frequently, the defintion of frequently seems to vary. Leave initial growth and other stuff uses that first layer as the foundations for palaces. This is all very well in warm waters but with advancing years colder waters are much more of a challenge.
Having a, cruising, cat we do find that speed helps with self cleaning, on ablatives, but this is really only effective for the forward half, the aft sections still do not get the water flow and cleaning is still necessary. I do not know whether CC shows this sort of effect. I'd apply it, CC, except for the cost of stripping off the old AF - very expensive here in Oz. The big problems are what to do about props, saildrives and the little section round the saildrive.