photodog
Lord High Commander of Upper Broughton and Gunthor
Having witnessed first hand events which were subsequently 'published' in the Daily Mail, I regret that I have NO confidence in that papers ability to report factually about almost any event involving the armed forces.
I am amazed that there seem to be people on these forums who think that any of the national newspapers work in any sort of dispassionate straight factual way. All the press reports 'from an angle' - the DM has various axes to grind, and for those who are the subject of their axe from time to time, its fairly tedious stuff. When something happens in the RN that can be spun to be embarrassing, then one can predict fairly accurately what the headline will be in the DM.
On the subject in hand, I also happen to know some of the background to the Chandlers - some friends of mine were involved locally at the incident and in the management chain - and I very much regret the innocent and total acceptance of stories that have been spun in the national press and in particular the DM. The DM may not actually lie - after all that would mean that people could take recourse through the courts - but the DM is VERY selective in how it reports events - and the reasons that some events take place. Have sense of proportion people. Just because the DM reports something in a particular way doesn't mean it actually happened for the reasons they claim in the editorial spin!!!
I hope that the Chandlers make lots of money for their story but I am very sorry that their story has been hijacked for the political whims of the DM and that people actually might believe what they read as a true and accurate analysis of what happened.
+1
.... and I work for the Mail.