zoidberg
Well-known member
I started taking marine navigation more seriously when I discovered it's the coloured side of charts that mattered.....
A Welcome Result in both eventualities.I note the news that a huge area of seabed in Plymouth Sound and Approaches has been discovered carpeted with an otherwise rare form of ancient seaweed, which 'fixes' lots of carbon.
Expect hordes of yoghurt knitters and muesli munchers - apologies, Life Members of the RYA's Blue-Green Brigade - to descend on Plymouth demanding no more anchoring, running of engines, moorings placement and submarine activities. Expect The King's Harbourmaster to have apoplexy, explode and disappear in a cloud of smoke.
When my whole country is going down the pan due hubris and archaisism, perhaps forum rules dont always trump other considerations.You really should keep opinions like that to yourself.
Forum rules and all that.
Should one be worried about people who have no idea what they are talking about? Britain’s deterrent isn’t based in Devonport. There are a few boats laid up in Devonport waiting to be dismantled but so what. I looked after the submariners of SM2 once upon a time and the only submarines based there then didn’t carry nuclear warheads and their reactors can’t explode. (Wrong sort of nuclear.) I think SM2 is no more nowadays and all in service boats are moving or have moved to Scotland?A Welcome Result in both eventualities.
We need to be serious about limiting global warming even if it needs a few rows and some inconvenience.
As for the KHM - well a/ he's not my f king and the harbour masters title is Ruritanean, and b/ as the harbour seems full of decaying submarines, uncertain live submarines that may not work to deter but if used could help extinguish life on planet, plus providing stopping point for Putins largest and best target, the harbour masters job seems to be fiiddling while Rome burns, so I am not worried if he is troubled in his idyl
I didnt know all the deterence had all moved - which makes me wonder where they will go once Scotland is independent. I certainly dont think the dead ones can explode but they can and probably will leak nuclear residue eventually. Some certainly seem active according to local gossip about departure times, but if all the Devonport ones are out of commission the harbour master is more like a scrapyard manager. However the Devonport Police patrols seem suggest there is something to guard other than scrap ironShould one be worried about people who have no idea what they are talking about? Britain’s deterrent isn’t based in Devonport. There are a few boats laid up in Devonport waiting to be dismantled but so what. I looked after the submariners of SM2 once upon a time and only submarines based there don’t carry nuclear warheads and their reactors can’t explode. (Wrong sort of nuclear.). I think SM2 is no more nowadays and all in service boats are moving or have moved to Scotland?
Devonport is the home base to a number of surface ships in addition to being a major refit yard for the RN and the home of FOST. (Flag Officer Sea Training) which multiple foreign navies buy into and which generates substantial training revenues for the UK.I didnt know all the deterence had all moved - which makes me wonder where they will go once Scotland is independent. I certainly dont think the dead ones can explode but they can and probably will leak nuclear residue eventually. Some certainly seem active according to local gossip about departure times, but if all the Devonport ones are out of commission the harbour master is more like a scrapyard manager. However the Devonport Police patrols seem suggest there is something to guard other than scrap iron
Dont let you Patriotic bias get in the way of common sense and the spirit of enquiry. Several local nuclear power station decalred harmless actuaually had radiation warnings logged with local council as revealed to me by my sister when working for such council. She expressed surprise I needed nav light as thought boat should glow in the dark.PPS You get more radiation dose walking across the granite of Dartmoor than you get from the Naval Base but don’t let the facts get in the way of any bias on your part.
Apologies to the OP for the thread drift.
I like Dark & Stormy’s. They can be a great cocktail. They can also make a great tale.Da nada, John. I don't mind. I've had my fair share of 'rads' from one source or another. Having a mooring on the Tamar isn't going to make a discernable difference.
And I respect 'oldmanofthehills' for his views.
'Meanwhile, back at the ranch', the OP will still be sifting through the stack of input he's had. He should be well able to 'pick the bones out' of it all.
Now.... did I ever tell you of the time we were intercepted by a nuclear attack submarine in the dead of night ( HMS Torbay ) on the fringes of the Cardigan Bay missile testing ranges, which frightened us witless? No? Well, 'it was a dark and stormy night'.....
Many years ago we made a night crossing of Cardigan Bay in company with a friend in his Westerly. His boat was equipped with an ancient LCD radar, heavy on electricity but very sensitive. He watched a signal astern of us for some time, keeping about the same speed as ourselves, when it suddenly disappeared. We assumed a submarine.Now.... did I ever tell you of the time we were intercepted by a nuclear attack submarine in the dead of night ( HMS Torbay ) on the fringes of the Cardigan Bay missile testing ranges, which frightened us witless? No? Well, 'it was a dark and stormy night'.....
When my whole country is going down the pan due hubris and archaisism, perhaps forum rules dont always trump other considerations.
Im sorry if that thought disturbs you