Kukri
Well-Known Member
Airlines differ in their reserve fuel policy. When I lived in Beijing I knew the then Airbus rep to Air China, who used to tear his hair out over the amount of spare kerosene they carted round the skies with them!
Note: I've never flown Ryanair and never intend to!
Staggering that they had that much extra fuel onboard !
It would have been no coffee nor biscuits for me if had taken that much extra fuel in my B777 flying days with BA.
Great outcome though.
Really? What is the mandated reserve?
90 minutes extra doesn't sound a lot to me for a flight from Vancouver to Sydney which is about 14 hours. Of course, they were at a lower level for a while, but still.
I take it you dont follow PPRUNE?I've flown Ryanair. I think they are brilliant. A very slick operation.
It's just a bus service and for short hops around Europe they are perfect.
I take it you dont follow PPRUNE?
They had to arrive at SYD with enough fuel to hold for 15minutes and divert to their planned alternate, probably Brisbane. That is AFTER flying around looking for the yacht.
That's why it's surprising that they had so much extra fuel onboard.
It could be that they were assured of a landing at SYD and used different rules, we used to have to use this when flying to Bermuda in TriStars, we had to commit some time out because we couldn't go around and fly to our alternate, JFK.
Maybe they had lots of fuel due to enroute single engine diversion, could be. I haven't flown for years, aviation part of my brain is rusty.
Staggering that they had that much extra fuel onboard !
It would have been no coffee nor biscuits for me if had taken that much extra fuel in my B777 flying days with BA.
Great outcome though.
Many moons ago - when one was allowed in the cockpit - I was chatting to the flight crew (in a then brand new) 777.
As glider pilot I asked about glide distance from 35,000 ft if both engines failed (135 NM if you're interested) and also as a sailor, would they be aware of a distress call.
They immediately pointed to one of the gazillion instruments in the cockpit showing a radio receiver tuned to 121.5 MHz (OK it's been phased out now) but it was reassuring!
Also got sit in on the night time landing into Boston.
Although the original thread was hijacked this is the story from the skipper who capsized and has been rescued:
A Queensland yachtsman has been tearfully reunited with his family in Sydney after a week-long ordeal stranded off the coast of New South Wales.
Glenn Ey hugged his crying mother when he set foot on land in Sydney early this morning.
![]()
On dry land: Glenn Ey arrives in Sydney after being rescued from his stricken yacht
The 44-year-old Queenslander spent days trying to outlast an enormous storm before his yacht was rolled by a monster wave last Friday.
"Let me assure you when a monster wave picks you up and just dumps you like that it's very frightening."
He says the boat was swamped and cracked, and his mast was split in four.
"You do think your number's up - there's no question about that," he said.
"When a monster wave picks you up and just dumps you like that it's very frightening," he said.
"The noise is unbelievable - a mast doesn't crack without any noise it's like an explosion and the hull cracked and things like that.
"It's very frightening and I can assure you I'll be happy to sit under a tree for a while."
A current had pulled Mr Ey's 11-metre yacht 270 nautical miles out to sea, and after four days he ran out of fuel and set off his emergency beacon.
Two passenger planes confirmed his location off Wollongong before Police Rescue boat Nemesis reached him that night.
![]()
Rolled by massive wave: Glenn Ey's yacht as photographed by a search and rescue plane
It spent 24 hours returning him to Sydney through five-metre waves and high winds in a rescue operation lasted 43 hours in total.
Mr Ey had left Sydney for Eden on the south coast two weeks ago.
http://www.abc.net.au/news/2012-10-18/yachtsman27s-emotional-return-to-land/4319800
You Raggies are a tough breed
I would have set my EPIRB off when the boat was demasted and 'punctured' , I wouldnt have relied on 30hp getting me home in those currents / conditions.
Little disappointed the authorities felt the need to 'see' a soul in distress before sending help following a clear distress call from EPIRB including coordinates.
Perhaps we need to carry two EPIBS, setting one off a few hours after the first in order to confirm distress.
You Raggies are a tough breed
. . . . . Little disappointed the authorities felt the need to 'see' a soul in distress before sending help following a clear distress call from EPIRB including coordinates. . . . . . .
I think that there was a little confusion due to the fact that there were three 'shouts' on 406 in similar area of the Tasman Sea on that day, all within 10 miles of each other?
TASMAN SEA.
DISTRESS SIGNAL RECEIVED ON 406 MHZ IN 34-40.1S 156-33.4E AT 152139Z OCT. VESSELS
IN VICINITY REQUESTED TO KEEP A SHARP LOOKOUT, ASSIST IF POSSIBLE. REPORTS TO RCC AUSTRALIA,
followed by
TASMAN SEA.
1. VESSEL, THREE PERSONS ON BOARD, CAPSIZED AND ADRIFT IN 34-40.1S 156-33.4E AT 152139Z OCT. VESSELS IN VICINITY REQUESTED TO KEEP A SHARP LOOKOUT, ASSIST IF POSSIBLE.
and
TASMAN SEA.
1. S/V STREAKER, ONE PERSON ON BOARD, DISMASTED AND ADRIFT VICINITY 34-45.2S 156-39.7E AT 160240Z OCT. VESSELS IN VICINITY REQUESTED TO KEEP A SHARP LOOKOUT.
Surely the first two are the same incident? Time and position are identical. I guess the first is recording that the distress transmission was received, the second giving more details about what the incident actually was.
Pete