alant
Well-Known Member
Re: Bloody French!
If gained legally.
So they don't need money to exist?
If gained legally.
So they don't need money to exist?
While I agree with the principle of what you say, they are not the rules and this is not the way to deal with it. The Brits are acting leagally under current rules and the French are acting like Somalian pirates.
Would you stand by and watch your livelihood being pillaged?
.....
Would you stand by and watch your livelihood being pillaged?
The aquarium at Millport used to have (may still have) a video showing the same stretch of seabed in the First of Clyde before and after scallp dredging. Before: a remarkable forest of beautiful wildlife. Afterwards: nothing. Scallop dredging is the plundering and destruction of a common resource for private gain and it should be banned outright.
In a related and entertaining spat, Solway scallop dredgers who, like the rest of the British fishing industry, have been campaigning against foreigners in UK waters are now outraged to find the Manx government restricting their access to Manx waters. Aigh vie erriu to the Manx, bon chance to the French.
Can you explain exactly what you mean by that? The current government position is that environmental protection will be enhanced once the UK has more control over its waters (and on land once we are free from the CAP).
I can't help but admire the French for getting off their derrieres and taking action against a blatant stupidity that allows others to fish when they can't. If only the apathetic Brits would do the same!
As for the damage caused by scallop dredgers, they should all be banned.
The government has no credible position on anything to do with Brexit.
So, they don't have a right to be upset when British fishermen destroy the scallop habitat? If the tables were turned, you would be cheering on the Brits.If gained legally.
So, they don't have a right to be upset when British fishermen destroy the scallop habitat? If the tables were turned, you would be cheering on the Brits.
I'm quite impressed with myself that I got the year right. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1993_Cherbourg_incidentI note the cries for 'the navy' to get out there and do something. I vaguely recall back in (I think) 1993, a similar dispute which culminated in a British fisheries protection vessel being boarded and 'arrested' by some French fishermen and the ensign being set aflame. One would hope that *if* fisheries protection decided to get involved again, that such a situation could be avoided.
The French brought stones with them, it was planned
They gave the British boats a weeks advance warning of the skirmish apparently.
The reason we see so many foreign fishing vessels in British waters is due to our fisherman retiring and flogging them their quotas and the boats then being scrapped. All legal and above board.
But of course there are those on here who would say the brexit vote voids those sales
Post Brexit we need to do exactly what Iceland did and declare a 50 mile exclusive limit. Where the border is less than 100 miles the economic zone is split evenly with neighbouring countries.
This is what should happen but it won't because every British government sees our fishing waters as a bargaining chip for something it perceives as more important. An exclusive 50 mile limit around Great Britain would give us a huge amount of control of Europes fishing grounds. The enforcement is simple foreign vessels caught fishing in UK waters will have their vessels seized, no fines, simply confiscation of the vessels.
Well then, as they are both destroying the future habitat of their income, let them have at each other. Perhaps, they will knock some sense into each other... probably not.But that is not what is happening. Read the post above. The dispute is about an agreement (or rather failing to make an agreement as in the past) to share out fishing days. Both use the same techniques for fishing. so in the days the French are allowed to fish for scallops they will be using trawls as well.
Are the French being shellfish![]()