Cardo
Well-Known Member
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I would certainly prefer one to a Hunter Legend.
[/ QUOTE ]
Why would you prefer one to a Legend? We have had a very good year with our Legend 36, which is a ton heavier than the Bav 36, much better finish below and sails generally better on all points of sail. We occasionally go sailing with friends of ours who own a Bav 36, and we generally manage to beat them (only just) back to the marina. Thats with our in-mast reefed main too, opposing their "proper" sails. As for living on board, the two don't compare. Even our Bav friends are envious of the Legend below decks.
I guess mine will slam a bit, being a fatty, but we don't mind that for the odd day where we have the forecast wrong, but for the other 364 days the comfort below is superb. I will be the first to admit to a bad choice if that's how it turns out, but we are very happy after one year and 1200 miles.
Pops
[/ QUOTE ]
So the Legends are fatties with plenty of space down below?
[ QUOTE ]
I would certainly prefer one to a Hunter Legend.
[/ QUOTE ]
Why would you prefer one to a Legend? We have had a very good year with our Legend 36, which is a ton heavier than the Bav 36, much better finish below and sails generally better on all points of sail. We occasionally go sailing with friends of ours who own a Bav 36, and we generally manage to beat them (only just) back to the marina. Thats with our in-mast reefed main too, opposing their "proper" sails. As for living on board, the two don't compare. Even our Bav friends are envious of the Legend below decks.
I guess mine will slam a bit, being a fatty, but we don't mind that for the odd day where we have the forecast wrong, but for the other 364 days the comfort below is superb. I will be the first to admit to a bad choice if that's how it turns out, but we are very happy after one year and 1200 miles.
Pops
[/ QUOTE ]
So the Legends are fatties with plenty of space down below?