apostrophes

Or perhaps the single most common error I hear, even on BBC radio stations, is "Me and Tom went to the movies" instead of "Tom and I went to the movies". :)

This used to crop up from time to time when the BBC TV News had two presenters.

They would be taken to task for sign-offs that went something like, "Goodnight from Tom and me.".

Every so often (slow news days) they would read one of these letters and state that, "Tom and me" is correct, but "you and me" is not and should be "you and I".
 
That is as wrong as "PIN number"

I once got an article published in the school magazine. Before printing I discussed any corrections with my English teacher: we both got stuck on the phrase "my boss's office", and to this day I'm still not sure if it correct. In the end, we changed it to "the office of my boss".

In his book 'Plain Words' Sir Ernest Gowers says that there is no universally accepted rule for words ending in 's'. He suggests that if the word is a plural ending in 's' then an apostrophe should be added at the end (strangers' gallery), while if the word is not a plural, and especially if it is a monosyllable, add 's (Mr Jones's room). Additionally he suggests that the apostrophe is needed with single letters (mind your p's and q's).
 
I feel uncomfortable writing 'He gave the book to Joe and me', but is correct.

It's just like the lounge over here, innit?
The "and I" or "and me" question can be resolved by removing the other party. In your case this becomes "He gave the book to me", which is, of course, correct. Sometimes it does appear awkward, though.
 
In his book 'Plain Words' Sir Ernest Gowers says that there is no universally accepted rule for words ending in 's'. He suggests that if the word is a plural ending in 's' then an apostrophe should be added at the end (strangers' gallery), while if the word is not a plural, and especially if it is a monosyllable, add 's (Mr Jones's room). Additionally he suggests that the apostrophe is needed with single letters (mind your p's and q's).

You think you're confused? So is London Blunderround...

stjames1.jpg




stjames2.jpg
 
As it stands it seems the English and the worst as speaking English. :)
No. We are in the vanguard of those wishing to update the language to satisfy out modern needs.

However, Estuarial mash-ups such as "off of" instead of "from" ("I got it off of my mate.") continue to annoy me.
 
GPSs seems fine to me.

Fewer is generally used with discrete numbers - e.g. There are fewer lorries than cars on the road.

Less is used more with non-discrete amounts - e.g. there is less sugar in a cake than flour.

Less is the singular form of fewer. Hence: there is less cake left, but there are fewer cakes left

That's why a supermarket had to change its signs a few years back to 'Ten Items or Fewer' Not 'less' as they originally wrote it.
 
This used to crop up from time to time when the BBC TV News had two presenters.

They would be taken to task for sign-offs that went something like, "Goodnight from Tom and me.".

Every so often (slow news days) they would read one of these letters and state that, "Tom and me" is correct, but "you and me" is not and should be "you and I".
The reason for this construction is that the full phrase is "....goodnight from Tom (and from) me", in which the words in parentheses are "understood".
The apostrophe dilemma can generally be solved by remembering that it represents an "e" that has been elided e.g. St Jameses.
At least, that's what I remember from school!
 
No. We are in the vanguard of those wishing to update the language to satisfy out modern needs.

However, Estuarial mash-ups such as "off of" instead of "from" ("I got it off of my mate.") continue to annoy me.

Our modern needs?

"I got it off of me mate."

Or are the Yanks the vanguard? I give you, "Brain Fart":p
 
No. We are in the vanguard of those wishing to update the language to satisfy out modern needs.

However, Estuarial mash-ups such as "off of" instead of "from" ("I got it off of my mate.") continue to annoy me.

"Updating the language to satisfy our modern needs" just involves adding new words where necessary. The changes that are being discussed here are simply laziness or lack of education - using the apostrophe to signify a plural serves no purpose in satisfying modern needs.
 
"Updating the language to satisfy our modern needs" just involves adding new words where necessary. The changes that are being discussed here are simply laziness or lack of education - using the apostrophe to signify a plural serves no purpose in satisfying modern needs.

As the originator of " Nut's and Bolt's " I still don't see the problem. It looks right to me. :D

On a less lighter note, I think some care has to be taken not to discourage people from having a go at posting.

Attention deficit, word blindness, dyslexia , a combination or pure stress/depression can contribute to errors . Modern spell checkers have been a boon . When an underlined error is indicated, the drop down suggestions, although spelt correctly , still make it possible to select the wrong word. Some of the better one's, or is it ones, include grammar errors, but you still have to see and understand the problem.
 
As the originator of " Nut's and Bolt's " I still don't see the problem. It looks right to me. :D

On a less lighter note, I think some care has to be taken not to discourage people from having a go at posting.

Attention deficit, word blindness, dyslexia , a combination or pure stress/depression can contribute to errors . Modern spell checkers have been a boon . When an underlined error is indicated, the drop down suggestions, although spelt correctly , still make it possible to select the wrong word. Some of the better one's, or is it ones, include grammar errors, but you still have to see and understand the problem.

I don't know you or your background, so I will not comment on your specific linguistic abilities. However, there are plenty of people who are so consistently wrong that they must actually believe that they are right. If it's down to "Attention deficit, word blindness, dyslexia , a combination or pure stress/depression ", then one would expect them to be correct some of the time!
 
Without wishing to query an eminent authority, should there be an apostrophe in last word of the phrase,

"what has it got in it's nasty pocketses?"
 
The greengrocer's apostrophe (nut's & bolt's) has been around for a long time and was normal usage a couple of hundred years ago but for the last hundred and fifty or so it has not been used in educated writing. The problem is not a moral one to my mind, but whatever the reason that brings it about, it holds up reading for those of us who are not accustomed to it and I would recommend to those who have not considered the matter that they try to avoid it if they want to put a point across to a general audience such as these forums.
 
Without wishing to query an eminent authority, should there be an apostrophe in last word of the phrase,

"what has it got in it's nasty pocketses?"

"pocketses" doesn't exist as a word except as a joke, so it would be "nasty pockets", and specifically, "its (without apostrophe) nasty pockets".
 
The greengrocer's apostrophe (nut's & bolt's) has been around for a long time and was normal usage a couple of hundred years ago but for the last hundred and fifty or so it has not been used in educated writing. The problem is not a moral one to my mind, but whatever the reason that brings it about, it holds up reading for those of us who are not accustomed to it and I would recommend to those who have not considered the matter that they try to avoid it if they want to put a point across to a general audience such as these forums.

fora?
 
Top