Plevier
Well-Known Member
Prompted by aitchem's question and not wishing to hijack his thread.
I have a slightly fractional - about 95% - Sparcraft rig. The spinnaker halyard emerges through a sheave box in the mast combined with the genoa halyard sheave box and the forestay attachment. The pic below was taken before the spin halyard was installed but it exits just above the forestay.
It's a horrible arrangement with lots of side friction and forestay fouling.
Any solution? Is it OK to put a crane on the masthead or must the spin hal be in line with the capstays? Is there another way?
(Before anyone suggests it, I have fitted a gen hal guide on the mast and could now remove the deflector disk.)
Later - looking at the Selden yacht catalogue page 150 there is a photo showing a similar fractional rig with the spin hal going to a masthead crane so must be OK?
I have a slightly fractional - about 95% - Sparcraft rig. The spinnaker halyard emerges through a sheave box in the mast combined with the genoa halyard sheave box and the forestay attachment. The pic below was taken before the spin halyard was installed but it exits just above the forestay.
It's a horrible arrangement with lots of side friction and forestay fouling.
Any solution? Is it OK to put a crane on the masthead or must the spin hal be in line with the capstays? Is there another way?
(Before anyone suggests it, I have fitted a gen hal guide on the mast and could now remove the deflector disk.)
Later - looking at the Selden yacht catalogue page 150 there is a photo showing a similar fractional rig with the spin hal going to a masthead crane so must be OK?
Attachments
Last edited: