PeterGibbs
Well-Known Member
Adding to your thoughts:
1. If the charging agent has no rights to charge then there can be no contract or any other pecuniary arrangement. Payment under such circumstances would amount to a tip !
2. Acquired rights do exist in property law, as you indicate, and even 12 years can constistute the basis of a claim/usage. But no consideration flows - just the right of use.
Squatting and squatters' rights are, as you know, an entirely different proposition.
But the harbours we are talking about here are apparently relying on ancient rights, and these have to be proven by charter or act of parliament. They are not acquired in the same way as a neighbour driving his car across your garden for 12 years en route to his garage etc. I cannot see how Xborough can send out a rubber duck for 12 or so years, then claim "it's all right by law" The act of charging does not make a right to charge, otherwise life would be unbearable.
PWG
1. If the charging agent has no rights to charge then there can be no contract or any other pecuniary arrangement. Payment under such circumstances would amount to a tip !
2. Acquired rights do exist in property law, as you indicate, and even 12 years can constistute the basis of a claim/usage. But no consideration flows - just the right of use.
Squatting and squatters' rights are, as you know, an entirely different proposition.
But the harbours we are talking about here are apparently relying on ancient rights, and these have to be proven by charter or act of parliament. They are not acquired in the same way as a neighbour driving his car across your garden for 12 years en route to his garage etc. I cannot see how Xborough can send out a rubber duck for 12 or so years, then claim "it's all right by law" The act of charging does not make a right to charge, otherwise life would be unbearable.
PWG