A
Anonymous
Guest
[ QUOTE ]
Pass another Pinkers ol-bean ...
[/ QUOTE ]
Thanks for the input, which is what I was hoping for.
Ideally, of course, we would have a chain counter (especially an integral one!) but that is not affordable or practicable for us.
There are just two of us on board - like thousands of cruising couples or families - and I don't let my wife anywhere near the ground tackle. It is too heavy and dangerous for her and there is no need so I don't need a system that is intuitive for others.
We anchor every day from May to September, very often in crowded or very constrained anchorages. Although markings every 5m might seem too fine to those of you who anchor occasionally and seldom in a very crowded anchorage, a few metres can make a big difference in the Med. Quite often in one wind direction you have to keep the rode very short but when the wind is in another direction you have more room. You seldom leave the chain length fixed if you are staying for a while, in a very crowded anchorage. When the weather is fine, you can often bring the scope down to 3:1, with a good bottom, but if the wind picks up you might need to increase that to 6:1 or much more. Suppose you are in 2m water, 2m freeboard, i.e. 4m 'depth', then 3:1 requires 12m chain and 6:1 requires 24m chain. Remember, a typical yacht is about 12m and we are often anchoring one boat length away. Frequently, others anchor to within a few metres or so then (hopefully) move on but not before we have had to pay out more chain to give clearance. So, you see, we are often changing the length of chain every day or several times a day, and we have to put out the minimum safe amount. The only way to calculate the minimum safe amount is on paper - find the depth, and make allowances for the bottom and the weather. It's not a 'seat of the pants' sort of calculation, it is quite deliberate and having made the decision to pay out, say, 18m, it would be nice to actually have 18m out there! As soon as you start paying out and bringing in chain on a regular basis you quickly lose track of where you are....you need a marking system that unequivocally states the length out there but you seldom (if ever) need to have that information instantly.
As for being 'intuitive', other than a chain counter, I don't know of any really intuitive system. I will print a card (photograph) which I will make up with Photoshop, which I will laminate and hang from the same necklace chain that the controller will hang from (see photo). There will be a diagram showing which way to read the colours, which will be as unambiguous as I am able (there will be a diagram on the rear side). It think that these colours, red, yellow and green, will be fine. We have a deck light and I always wear a head-lamp on deck at night, anyway.
As for base 3 vs base 2, or any other numbering system, if you look at the most significant digit, that gives a first order indication of depth. Have a look at the pattern and you will see that it is not as un-user-friendly as you would imagine. Similarly, the next most significant digit. Base 2 would require too many coloured bits; that would make it harder to read, and they are expensive! Base 10 would be ideal, using the resistor colour code, but I have found (and been told by others who have had the same experience) that after a short while paint becomes very hard to discriminate; you can always see that the area has been painted, but it becomes hard to determine between colours. I haven't found a source of anchor markers in the required colours for the resistor code - maybe there is a market opportunity for the manufacturers.
Many thanks for your thoughts, I appreciate the feedback, and please keep them coming in as I shall not make the final decision until the weekend.
Pass another Pinkers ol-bean ...
[/ QUOTE ]
Thanks for the input, which is what I was hoping for.
Ideally, of course, we would have a chain counter (especially an integral one!) but that is not affordable or practicable for us.
There are just two of us on board - like thousands of cruising couples or families - and I don't let my wife anywhere near the ground tackle. It is too heavy and dangerous for her and there is no need so I don't need a system that is intuitive for others.
We anchor every day from May to September, very often in crowded or very constrained anchorages. Although markings every 5m might seem too fine to those of you who anchor occasionally and seldom in a very crowded anchorage, a few metres can make a big difference in the Med. Quite often in one wind direction you have to keep the rode very short but when the wind is in another direction you have more room. You seldom leave the chain length fixed if you are staying for a while, in a very crowded anchorage. When the weather is fine, you can often bring the scope down to 3:1, with a good bottom, but if the wind picks up you might need to increase that to 6:1 or much more. Suppose you are in 2m water, 2m freeboard, i.e. 4m 'depth', then 3:1 requires 12m chain and 6:1 requires 24m chain. Remember, a typical yacht is about 12m and we are often anchoring one boat length away. Frequently, others anchor to within a few metres or so then (hopefully) move on but not before we have had to pay out more chain to give clearance. So, you see, we are often changing the length of chain every day or several times a day, and we have to put out the minimum safe amount. The only way to calculate the minimum safe amount is on paper - find the depth, and make allowances for the bottom and the weather. It's not a 'seat of the pants' sort of calculation, it is quite deliberate and having made the decision to pay out, say, 18m, it would be nice to actually have 18m out there! As soon as you start paying out and bringing in chain on a regular basis you quickly lose track of where you are....you need a marking system that unequivocally states the length out there but you seldom (if ever) need to have that information instantly.
As for being 'intuitive', other than a chain counter, I don't know of any really intuitive system. I will print a card (photograph) which I will make up with Photoshop, which I will laminate and hang from the same necklace chain that the controller will hang from (see photo). There will be a diagram showing which way to read the colours, which will be as unambiguous as I am able (there will be a diagram on the rear side). It think that these colours, red, yellow and green, will be fine. We have a deck light and I always wear a head-lamp on deck at night, anyway.
As for base 3 vs base 2, or any other numbering system, if you look at the most significant digit, that gives a first order indication of depth. Have a look at the pattern and you will see that it is not as un-user-friendly as you would imagine. Similarly, the next most significant digit. Base 2 would require too many coloured bits; that would make it harder to read, and they are expensive! Base 10 would be ideal, using the resistor colour code, but I have found (and been told by others who have had the same experience) that after a short while paint becomes very hard to discriminate; you can always see that the area has been painted, but it becomes hard to determine between colours. I haven't found a source of anchor markers in the required colours for the resistor code - maybe there is a market opportunity for the manufacturers.
Many thanks for your thoughts, I appreciate the feedback, and please keep them coming in as I shall not make the final decision until the weekend.