Anchor chain - how Much you use?

GMac

New member
Joined
20 Jun 2005
Messages
580
Visit site
Re: Not trying to be smart ... just confused ..

[ QUOTE ]
The problem is: how to lower the extreme stresses created when a chain already under some tension suddenly has to cope with the additional snatch of a boat sailing around it's anchor (or pitching in a wave). So we're talking 30kts wind plus . . . when there's not much catenary, and what catenary there is left (your expression - buffering?) will only give you centimeters of spring.

[/ QUOTE ]

A few cm or not the forces required to get those can be very large which creates the damping effect.

Nothing wrong with rope, so much so every rode must have some at some stage. On all chain when the wind starts to really pipe up and additional 'stretch' is good. In nicer weather possibly not as there is enough in the chain itself. The 'stretch' in that case is the forces required to get the chain into a situation where it is about to lose any curve or sag it may have left. Those forces are quite large.

X squared by the dingle dangle of the dodacky maybe, not that I have the slighest idea what that actualy does/is/means or whatever. All I know the easyest way in most cases to stop people dragging is to add a bit more chain. Do it very often (multiple time a day at this time of the year) and it works. Simple really.

This is not a thing that happens often with all chain rodes. We will shortly start replacing chains on cruisers heading off next season. Some willl be due to wear or rust and use the same size. The chances are very very high we will swap some on some US boats which will go up at least one size. Why? It increases the holding, which they found on the way down was not the best. This is usually as they did a common US thing and used small but high grade chains. Saved weight, have high strength, spent a pile of money but all that don't mean squat when your sliding around the Pacific.

I think this thread also has a few things to keep in mind. the word 'catenery' and 'holding' are being used possibly not quite in the right or best way in some posts, mine included. Also some people are talking at extreme end of things, which in reality 99% of boats will never actually do. Interesting stuff though all the same.

I'm off to get my numbers and have the last full day of pre-Xmas punters making me what to kill someone /forums/images/graemlins/smile.gif A bit like a full moon at the office at the moment.
 
G

Guest

Guest
Re: lack of curve .... (catenary) against m\'self ??

How ... I was using it to illustrate the lack of bar taut in real life ..

The force needed to reduce the rodes curve (better word I think than catenary !) would match that exerted by boat long before the rode is straight ... in normal circumstances ....
 

RupertW

Well-known member
Joined
20 Mar 2002
Messages
10,265
Location
Greenwich
Visit site
Re: Not trying to be smart ... just confused ..

[ QUOTE ]
A few cm or not the forces required to get those can be very large which creates the damping effect.



[/ QUOTE ]

The forces go up rapidly with each tiny last fraction of straightening of the rode, so you're right that there could be a very large difference in force to move the last couple of centimetres. However, my understanding of dampening is the reduction of a sharp spike in the amount of force applied by smoothing that spike into one that is lower and longer. That means that the distance of stretch and the time it takes is the important part and a few centimeters won't help at all.

E.g. a force equivalent to 1 ton of static weight is increased to a spike of 11 tons within 1/10th of a second by a veering yacht snatching, then back to 1 ton again in another 1/10th of a second.

With only a few centimetres in play the full 11 tons gets applied immediately then drops back to 1 ton all within 2/10ths of a second.

With a decent length of nylon rode involved then then the time taken to stretch the rope might be as much as a second, thus applying a force peaking at 2 tons but lasting for a full second.

It's the difference between peak force of 11 tons (all chain) and 2 tons (chain and nylon) that gives the anchor a chance to keep holding.
 
G

Guest

Guest
I have to disagree ....

The snatch on chain against rope would be significantly different. Regardless of "stretch" element.

The chain has significantly higher weight itself - which would help to dissipate part of the shock before it hits the anchor. The more chain the shock has to move or transmit through - the more is dissipated.
With rope you do not have the advantage of weight and it is now only stretch that is stopping the shock being transmitted 100% to the anchor ... subject of course to any chain you may have in the system.

I agree to a snub of rope ... but mine would never approach 20m ... in fact is more likely to be a couple of metres max. To quieten the bow area down.

Rope has no weight ... chain does ... therefore chain will have far higher dampening effect by the action of lifting it to straighten etc.

Compare weighing anchor ... rope + chain rode against all chain rode .... I know which is harder and heavier work. And let's be honest IMHO - the reason rope / chain rodes became popular in the first place was ease of use ... later people found ways to justify the mix ... Not being argumentative .. honest it's my opinion ....

As another said - there are posts in conflict as they / we are talking about different conditions ... I for one have no intention of anchoring in bad weather unless absolutely necessary. Therefore my posting is referenced to normal or reasonable conditions ... if it gets that bad to start lifting all my chain of the bottom - as I said before - if possible I would prefer to lift anchor and ride it out underway.
 

RupertW

Well-known member
Joined
20 Mar 2002
Messages
10,265
Location
Greenwich
Visit site
Re: I have to disagree ....

I agree with you about the dampening effect of chain until it is within a few centimetres of being straight, and that's the situation I was replying to.

At that point you've lost virtually all the dampening effect and therefore a snatch load will not be damped. Those are extreme but not uncommon conditions. Like others I have many times seen the entire chain rising off the seabed even at 10:1 scope. Much less common is for it to become nearly straight, but once it's almost straight than it's got the dampening properties of steel bar.

I like the concept of only anchoring in good conditions but for many people that's not practical, particularly in parts of the world where marinas are rare and squalls common. If you really do only intend to anchor in conditions where you lie to chain alone, then you can genuinely dispense with the anchor /forums/images/graemlins/laugh.gif
 

jimbaerselman

New member
Joined
18 Apr 2006
Messages
4,433
Location
Greece in Summer, Southampton in Winter
www.jimbsail.info
Re: I have to disagree ....

[ QUOTE ]
I for one have no intention of anchoring in bad weather unless absolutely necessary. Therefore my posting is referenced to normal or reasonable conditions ... if it gets that bad to start lifting all my chain of the bottom - as I said before - if possible I would prefer to lift anchor and ride it out underway.

[/ QUOTE ] Ah. There lies a big difference. I guess a lot of my anchoring is in the Cyclades, often in meltemi conditions, when 25% of the high summer the breeze whistles down the side of a hill at 30 - 40kts, in otherwise wonderful weather.

So I've developed a lot of habits to deal with that. I like my time ashore enjoying a good stifado, infinitely preferable to spending a couple of days at sea where everything is bouncing around like hell. So my 'normal or reasonable' seems very different from yours.

And a lot of the lessons I've learnt have come from watching charter vessels romping around the bay from midnight to whenever when the wind has un-expectedly come in. Great entertainment; until one bumps into you!
 

jimbaerselman

New member
Joined
18 Apr 2006
Messages
4,433
Location
Greece in Summer, Southampton in Winter
www.jimbsail.info
Re: Not trying to be smart ... just confused ..

Agree completely with your post. But there's one point of definition - a matter of terms - which it brings up.
[ QUOTE ]
However, my understanding of dampening is the reduction of a sharp spike in the amount of force applied by smoothing that spike into one that is lower and longer.

[/ QUOTE ]
If we're talking physics, and oscillatory motions, which is where the average force oscillates around a mean, the key elements are :

1. The spring, or the force returning a displacement to neutral. Left alone (no friction or drag) your pendulum (a nice example) will happily swing on at the same amplitude for days. A yacht at anchor in a good wind with a fin keel will also happily sail from side to side for hours on end, since the force driving it happily cancels out the frictions and drag elements . . .

2. Ah, the friction and drag elements - now they'd slow down the oscillation until it died out. 'Dampening' in the physicists language.

Chain on the ground will provide such dampening in the yacht case (as does water resistance). And, to a very small degree, chain being lifted up and dropped by varying tensions would also provide some damping.

So, your reduction in spike comes from having a softer spring, rather than dampening -

But this is just a trivial matter of terminology which doesn't affect the argument.
 

GMac

New member
Joined
20 Jun 2005
Messages
580
Visit site
Re: Not trying to be smart ... just confused ..

SBC Rocks. Right in there with you brother /forums/images/graemlins/smile.gif

Well, I do believe we all maybe in agreement. Fancy that
 

gaustin

New member
Joined
8 Nov 2006
Messages
16
Visit site
Adding a 20 meter snubber - how

how do you attach 20 meters of snubber?
I have seen a chain hook on 3m of rope but surely it would fall off with 22 meters of slack.

Regards Guy
 

DaveS

Well-known member
Joined
25 Aug 2004
Messages
5,484
Location
West Coast of Scotland
Visit site
Re: Adding a 20 meter snubber - how

This does raise the subject of why chain hooks aren't made with a sprung latch of some sort to hold them in place. This would seem to be an obvious improvement since they have a tendency to fall off while letting out chain to transfer tension to the snubber. So why can't an "improved" version be obtained? Unless anyone knows different...
 

DaveS

Well-known member
Joined
25 Aug 2004
Messages
5,484
Location
West Coast of Scotland
Visit site
Re: Adding a 20 meter snubber - how

Yes, I've got a couple of these - really in case I ever want to join chains together or make up a complicated mooring or something. They're a bit fiddly for just hooking on a snubber, though.
 
Top