chris-s
Well-Known Member
Right then...the swivel has been put in the scrap metal bin, along with the original crappy anchor.
Thanks guys.
Thanks guys.
We have used a swivel for very many years. Our Rocna inevitably comes up reversed and the crew is unable to rotate it without a swivel.
Our original swivel broke due to stress-corrosion. I replaced it with a Kong and developed the three chain links method, in about 2007. A Kong is a quality item, considerably stronger than the chain.
Destructive testing results on many rode items including swivels are on my website Cox Engineering.
Not with a grooved roller, which we have to hold the anchor centrally. Otherwise it slides from side to side on tacks. Also seems to prevent a Boomerang from rotating it although NormanS' round bar version will probably work.I used to expend a lot of effort rotating the Rocna before it went onto the roller, until I realised that if I just raised it and stopped when the anchor was half-on-half-off, it would right itself.
Our original swivel broke due to stress-corrosion. I replaced it with a Kong and developed the three chain links method, in about 2007. A Kong is a quality item, considerably stronger than the chain.

We have a grooved roller and a Rocna with no swivel. With the grooved roller the anchor comes up the right way 90% of the time - particularly if encouraged with a gentle reverse.Not with a grooved roller, which we have to hold the anchor centrally. Otherwise it slides from side to side on tacks. Also seems to prevent a Boomerang from rotating it although NormanS' round bar version will probably work.
It was Jimmy Green chandlery who stated that the three links were unnecessary. They now sell them specifically for the job.Vyv was the first to come up with this idea and it is by far the best method of attachment if you want to use a standard swivel. If I remember correctly, at the time he argued with the swivel maker Kong who said it was unnecessary, however, they have since seen the light of sound engineering practice and incorporate Vyv’s idea into their instructions.
Providing you use this method with a quality swivel (such as Kong) there is nothing wrong with using a swivel.
There are a small number of swivels that have more articulation where the extra links of chain are not needed, but with most standard swivels side loading will cause damage, as the photo below shows (notice how the forks of the swivel are splayed out), although that is least of his worries.
I am not a great fan of anchor straighteners. They do not solve the problem of chain twist (although some incorporate a swivel feature). There is lot of bulk and connections that can become hung up on the anchor and cause an unfair lead and this added bulk inhibits the anchor performance.
The anchor coming up backwards can be a nuisance, but for most concave anchors reversing the boat will swing the anchor around to the correct orientation without a swivel.
View attachment 152814
Thanks for the correction. Pity they don’t give you any credit.It was Jimmy Green chandlery who stated that the three links were unnecessary. They now sell them specifically for the job.
20kg Rocna and shake only, no swivel.


……. or just shackle the chain to the anchor and go sailingplenty more options, lets have a few more![]()



Don't worry about doing this, as you only have to open up 8mm chain very slightly to get a half inch shackle through it. It might even go in anyway as some chain size diagrams show a 13mm dimension. If opening the end link damages the galvanising, again don't worry as its only the final link and you can always cut it off if it gets too rusty. You might also open the end link enough just by squeezing it endwise in a big vice.It's very easy to open up the end link of the chain, using a tapered drift and a hammer. This allows the use of a bigger, stronger shackle. OK with mild steel chain, - don't know about doing that with some of the higher grades of chain.