An answer from Gus Lewis today

sailorman

Well-Known Member
Joined
21 May 2003
Messages
78,996
Location
temp ashore, i expect to be back🤞
Visit site
Dear Mr Sailorman
Thank you for your email.

The Government confirmed yesterday that it has no intention to make it unlawful for red diesel bought in the UK to be used outside UK territorial waters. In international waters, recreational boaters are not subject to any restrictions on the use of red diesel.

However, it is a fundamental principle of international law that if you visit the territorial waters of another country then you are subject to that country's fiscal laws. Article 21 of the 1982 UN Convention on the Law of the Sea makes it clear that Coastal States have fiscal jurisdiction over their territorial waters. In practice, of course, most countries adopt the principle of "comity" (short for "comity of nations"), which means "the friendly recognition accorded by one nation to the laws and usages of another", but this does not mean that Coastal States cannot, or that some do not, apply their own fiscal rules to visiting vessels around the world if they choose to do so.

The purpose of the various EU Directives was to ensure that all EU member states exercised their fiscal jurisdiction in the same way but, unfortunately, the drafting of the Directives was such that different member states have interpreted them differently. It is this disparity that we are seeking to resolve with the UK and Belgian Governments and the European Commission.

The only country in which we are aware of UK boaters (or local boaters returning from the UK) having been penalised for the mere presence of marked diesel in their yachts’ main fuel tanks is Belgium. Like the UK, Ireland continues to allow private pleasure craft to use marked diesel and marked diesel is widely available in non-EU countries such as Norway and the Channel Islands. The Dutch authorities have confirmed that they have no difficulty with UK yachtsmen having red diesel in their yachts' fuel tanks and we have no indication that either the French or Spanish authorities take a different view.

The situation in Belgium existed long before the Minister's announcement on 20 February 2012 and it will not be resolved by HMRC's proposed amendment to the declaration boaters make when buying diesel in the UK. The Government is optimistic, however, that as a result of the proposed amendment to the declaration the European Commission will withdraw its infraction proceedings against the UK. If this proves to be the case, it would greatly assist the RYA's discussions with the Belgian Government.

It is worth bearing in mind that a substantial number of UK motor and sailing yachts visit Belgium every year and yet only a very few have been accosted by the authorities and fewer still have been fined. We have received reports from fewer than half a dozen individuals who have been fined in Belgium in the last couple of years, despite having had all the appropriate receipts etc on board, and I am aware of a contingent of motor cruisers from the Thames that visited Belgium last year without incident. I have also spoken to yachtsmen who have been stopped by the Belgian authorities when the authorities have taken no interest at all in the colour of fuel on board and we are aware of a number of rallies to Belgium organised for later this year in relation to which the Belgian authorities have indicated that they will not take action against visiting UK yachts over the colour of diesel.

The principal reason behind our lobbying for private pleasure craft to be able to continue to use marked diesel was to secure the continued availability of diesel fuel. Many suppliers of diesel to pleasure craft only have a single diesel tank and pump and, had these suppliers been obliged to supply only unmarked diesel to private pleasure craft, they would have been faced with the cost of either installing a second fuel tank and pumping equipment or flushing their old tank and equipment and thereafter only supplying unmarked diesel.

Research conducted by the RYA and the BMF in 2005 indicated that, had suppliers been obliged to supply only unmarked diesel to private pleasure craft, approximately one third of the suppliers then supplying diesel to leisure boaters would have ceased to do so and would have limited their supplies to marked diesel for commercial operators. This would have had a significant impact on the availability of diesel for leisure boaters in more remote parts of the country, especially where coastal harbours cater predominantly for commercial (fishing) craft. Such areas include Scotland, Northern Ireland and the West Country.

The converse was the case for the inland waterways. Nearly half of the suppliers supplying diesel to leisure boaters in 2005 indicated that they would have ceased supplying marked diesel. This would have had a significant impact on the availability of marked diesel for those narrowboats and barges (many of which are people’s homes) that rely on such fuel for providing heating and electricity generation.

The RYA has been working hard on this issue on behalf of recreational boaters for nearly ten years now, and continues to do so, in an effort to ensure that the UK Government finds a resolution that is right for all UK boaters, wherever they are located in the UK and wherever they do their cruising or racing.

With kind regards.

Gus

Gus Lewis
Head of Legal & Government Affairs
Royal Yachting Association
T: 023 8060 4220 | E: gus.lewis@rya.org.uk
 
In all the time I've taken an interest in this topic, I've not yet seen any evidence that the Belgians have actually fined anyone.

Does anyone actually know of anyone who's been fined? Is this an urban legend?
 
What have the Belgians ever done for us, eh? Apart from the beer:D
Mounted a very efficient and dedicated rescue effort when the Herald of Free Enterprise capsized! Contrasts somewhat with our discoordinated response to the 7/7 emergency in London and the brave but flawed attempt to deal with the Kings Cross Underground fire.
 
But surely there still exists the possibility the say, France, could decide to start dipping tanks and fining, or do I misunderstand?
 
Galadriel,

don't give them ideas !

Probably tempting fate here, but in all the times I've sailed to France, I've never even seen a French official, a while ago when I once asked a local how to report in, he motioned to my 'Q' flag and said " take it down, take it down ".

The UK Customs always seem very diligent in sampling ones' wine purchases though...
 
A friend I sail with who keeps his boat in Holland met an English couple who last summer were sailing in Belgian waters in their Westerly Konsort.They were stopped and boarded outside Ostende, escorted in and fined for having red diesel.They had the receipts etc.
 
See the last sentence of paragraph 4 - for what it is worth.

But, of course, prior to the beginning of April, the UK government was still saying that it believed that what we were doing was compliant with EU rules. After the 1st April we will be sailing into continental waters having signed an acknowledgement that the red diesel in our tanks is not necessarily legal there.
 
In all the time I've taken an interest in this topic, I've not yet seen any evidence that the Belgians have actually fined anyone.

Does anyone actually know of anyone who's been fined? Is this an urban legend?

Did you not bother to read the letter?

We have received reports from fewer than half a dozen individuals who have been fined in Belgium in the last couple of years, despite having had all the appropriate receipts etc on board,

So that's at least a handful reported to the RYA, and the fines can be eyewatering at 7k - even in euros that could do one serious damage.
 
In all the time I've taken an interest in this topic, I've not yet seen any evidence that the Belgians have actually fined anyone.

+1 to your overall point.

Guapa said 4 only boats had been prosecuted and all were already being done for something else. (You can imagine - if they find a ton of Heroin they might as well check the diesel and throw the book at them.) I've no way of confirming that but it has the ring of truth to it & is consistent with: "fewer than half a dozen individuals".

Possibly a fuss about nothing.

Also from that reply it appears that you can write ahead to get imunity to Red Diesel crimes!
 
The research the RYA and BMF undertook was in 2005, 7 years ago! Things have changed a lot in the intervening period but they continue to relying out of date material, it beggars belief!
 
Did you not bother to read the letter?
...
So that's at least a handful reported to the RYA, and the fines can be eyewatering at 7k - even in euros that could do one serious damage.

Hearsay, still no evidence.

I want to hear from someone who was fined or at the very least dipped. Not someone who knows someone who once met someone who wrote a letter about someone....
 
Were you there?

Mounted a very efficient and dedicated rescue effort when the Herald of Free Enterprise capsized! Contrasts somewhat with our discoordinated response to the 7/7 emergency in London and the brave but flawed attempt to deal with the Kings Cross Underground fire.

What are you basing this information on?

More than 30 fire engines attended the kings cross fire, the officer in charge of the first appliance was killed, the attending senior officer was commended for his command and control of a very difficult incident. What was flawed ?were you there??

With regard to 7/7 what was dicoordinated?? Major incident declared (Aldgate) within 5 mins of LFB attendance, ITU beds being prepared at the London Hospital 7 minutes later. Emergency services working in what could have been a very dynamic situation e.g.Bio, radiation,chemical Hazards or secondary explosions.


If you are going to make statements like above please research the incidents prior!!
 
But, of course, prior to the beginning of April, the UK government was still saying that it believed that what we were doing was compliant with EU rules. After the 1st April we will be sailing into continental waters having signed an acknowledgement that the red diesel in our tanks is not necessarily legal there.

This is exactly my concern, 'last sentence, para four' is hardly a binding declaration by France, Spain etc. When these countries see what an easy way this is of raising revenue to help their suffering economies, once they realise that HMRC have made us an easy target will they want to miss the opportunity?
 
What are you basing this information on?

More than 30 fire engines attended the kings cross fire, the officer in charge of the first appliance was killed, the attending senior officer was commended for his command and control of a very difficult incident. What was flawed ?were you there??

With regard to 7/7 what was dicoordinated?? Major incident declared (Aldgate) within 5 mins of LFB attendance, ITU beds being prepared at the London Hospital 7 minutes later. Emergency services working in what could have been a very dynamic situation e.g.Bio, radiation,chemical Hazards or secondary explosions.


If you are going to make statements like above please research the incidents prior!!
Re Kings Cross fire, I stated heroic actions and I appreciate a brave Fire Officer sadly lost his life but there was evidence that some passengers were directed into the fire and trains were still stopping at KX adding to the difficulties, when they should have been ordered to run through.
Re 7/7 I base my post on the report of the Coroner's Report in the "quality" press.
A key issue-underground communications-identified as a problem in the Kings Cross fire-had still not been addressed satisfactorily by 7/7.
 
Top