AC and seawater - safe after all?

Gerry

Well-Known Member
Joined
2 Jan 2002
Messages
1,537
Location
Devon
www.gerryantics.blogspot.com
Having raised a thread on the acceptable level of earth leakage in a marina a couple of weeks ago, I promised to share the marina's reply:

“I understand that there have been questions about the leakage current in the marina settings for the ground fault detector and possible damage from electrolysis.

I just talked to Jim Shaffer about all these issues. Jim is probably the industry expert on these subjects, has the best data base and understanding of the problems involved. He is currently working under US government grant to set the industry standards for these devices, ground fault monitors and ground fault detectors for the US coast guard.

The primary source of confusion that arises when reading the Marina Guard document “Electrical Safety in Marina” (16 pages) is between the table on page 4 thats states that 2 to 10 milliamperes will produce a “slight to strong muscular reaction” and 5 to 25 milliamperes will produce “strong shock, inability to let go”. This sounds pretty much like death for a swimmer. The seemingly conflicting statement on page 13 is “please note that in most applications, the Marina Guard is set to 10 amperes fault current”. This level of current (10 amperes) is 400 times what is stated above to cause “inability to let go”, or sure death.

Jim Shaffer was able to explain this difference or seeming inconsistency. He says that there can be 5 amps of current flowing from a boat into the water and a swimmer nearby will only feel a tingle, no danger. The conductivity of the sea water is absorbing a lot of current from the bonded electrical system on the boat and very little passes through the body of the swimmer.

In fact, in doing research he has recorded 44 cases of electrocution in a marina-type setting. Of these cases, 44 were in fresh water and none... none were in salt water. Fresh water, ironically, is more dangerous because then the person is then the conductor of the current!

What about the case where the swimmer is cleaning his prop and touches the prop shaft, for instance? In this case the majority of the current passes directly into the sea water even though the body fluids are similar to seawater THE INSULATING PROPERTIES of the skin isolate the swimmer from the harmful current. Jim refers to an experiment connecting 110 VAC to a glass of salt water and putting your finger in it and not feeling more than a tingle. If there is a cut the connection to the body fluids is more direct and the sensation is pain at the break in the skin.

This latter situation is a concern, Jim says that anyone who is working on a boat from in the water would be crazy to not disconnect the boat from shore power first.

I described the results from the recent installation of the Ground Fault Monitor on Dock 3. I recorded the readings as power was connected to the Power Pylons. The readings were about 1 to 2 milliamperes on three of the circuits and less on the rest. When all circuits were energized the reading was 3 milliamperes. Jim says that this is a very good level much than he has seen in other marinas where 600 milliamperes is not uncommon.

In light of the above it can be seen why, settings of 500 milliamperes to 5 amps are acceptable. I left the unit set at 40 milliamperes well above the 3 milliamperes to avoid false tripping and well below th 500 miliamps t o 5 to 10 amps Bender recommends.

About electrolysis. Jim Shaffer says that the only boats that he has seen have problems are aluminium boats or power boats aor sail boats with aluminum sail drives, our out drives or outboards. Then this only occurs with currents of several amps and over a period of weeks. The low level of current in our marina is well below this, more than 100 times less.”
 
that is all very well for personnel safety, but most of the problem is at a much lower leakage level, than these limits, and the problem manifests itself by a very fast wasting of the anodes, - so far so good, but after thee anodes, it will start on whatever else is available, and in most cases, this includes seacocks. a de-zinced seacock can kill you just as much as a direct electric shock.
 
Theoretcally at least AC should not cause electrolysis simply because the current and voltage are constantly reversing.
However in this strange world it is possible for some dissimilar metal joints to form a crude diode permitting current only in one direction so you could get an electrolysis probelm. I think the only practical answer is to monitor your sacrificial anodes for deteriation over an initially short periood then increase period with exp0erience.
olewill
 
Adjustable RCDs should not be used for personal protection.

If a device is causing nuisance tripping the likelihood is that there is a fault requiring rectification rather than there being a means of circumventing the close personal protection which a low current RCD is able to provide.

30mA is usually specified for personal protection and in a wet area a 10mA device is preferable.

Shaffer is quoted as saying that a boat should be disconnected before it is worked on. Whilst this may be good advice it may not be thought about and it is not necesssary to 'work' on a boat to become part of a faulty electric circuit.

Shaffer also recognises the problem of electrolysis particularly regarding aluminium but seemingly believes that low level current and associated corrosion are acceptable. /forums/images/graemlins/confused.gif

Each outlet in a marina should have its own personal protection RCD.

The cabling supplying those outlets may be protected by a higher current device in order to localise the effect of faults.

There may be a case for an adjustable RCD which is able to more closely monitor the entire marina at a lower current than could otherwise be used to localise a fault. The primary function of that device would be to protect the installation from stray currents which may cause fire or other problems rather than give any degree of personal protection. The calibration of an adjustable device would have to be tested after each adjustment to ensure that the actual tripping currents were as indicated.
 
Top