Yngmar
Well-Known Member
This came up in a discussion about sliding hatch lubricants. I've previously used McLube Sailkote with great success, but the stuff costs an outrageous price. Since storm Katie left my nicely sailkoted hatch tracks full of grinding salt crystals, I thought I'd pick up a can of WD-40 Specialist Dry PTFE Lubricant and try it out for a comparison. Being a stingy bastard, I'm very interested in replacing fancy yottie lubricants with civilian alternatives for a fraction of the money.
The results were disappointing. It neither left the expected white stains (of PTFE), nor did it lubricate the tracks very much at all. That was after I'd wiped off salt and previous lubricants with warm soapy water. The Sailkote had done near magical things, actually making the hatch slide too easily - it was sliding around when the boat moved.
So I got a little curious and sprayed them both on a piece of brown cardboard. I sprayed for 3 seconds from approx. 7 cm distance into the center of the marked area. Then waited for the solvents to evaporate. As you can see in the photo below, the Sailkote left clear white powdery residue, which must be the PTFE. The WD-40 left none, at least none that I could see (no microscope on the boat, sorry). So where is the PTFE? Is it too small to see, or simply absent, or is there (I suspect) just so much less of it?
Other things worth noting: The Sailkote solvent evaporated slightly faster, and ran much less far then the WD-40. It also seems to have left less of a dark stain on the cardboard.
So where's the PTFE? Is finely powdered PTFE so expensive they have to be stingy with it? It sure doesn't cost much when bought as tape. If there is PTFE and it's just invisible for whatever reason (too fine?), why doesn't the WD-40 work as lubricant?
The results were disappointing. It neither left the expected white stains (of PTFE), nor did it lubricate the tracks very much at all. That was after I'd wiped off salt and previous lubricants with warm soapy water. The Sailkote had done near magical things, actually making the hatch slide too easily - it was sliding around when the boat moved.
So I got a little curious and sprayed them both on a piece of brown cardboard. I sprayed for 3 seconds from approx. 7 cm distance into the center of the marked area. Then waited for the solvents to evaporate. As you can see in the photo below, the Sailkote left clear white powdery residue, which must be the PTFE. The WD-40 left none, at least none that I could see (no microscope on the boat, sorry). So where is the PTFE? Is it too small to see, or simply absent, or is there (I suspect) just so much less of it?
Other things worth noting: The Sailkote solvent evaporated slightly faster, and ran much less far then the WD-40. It also seems to have left less of a dark stain on the cardboard.
So where's the PTFE? Is finely powdered PTFE so expensive they have to be stingy with it? It sure doesn't cost much when bought as tape. If there is PTFE and it's just invisible for whatever reason (too fine?), why doesn't the WD-40 work as lubricant?