LittleSister
Well-Known Member
Weren't we advised by various revolutionaries to throw off our shackles? 
Or were those shekels?Weren't we advised by various revolutionaries to throw off our shackles?![]()
Many of us totally ignored the advice and got married - and found that being shackled to your wife (or husband) had distinct advantages.Weren't we advised by various revolutionaries to throw off our shackles?![]()
And, historically, was not conducted by some shackle makers themselves.This demonstrates that you cannot rely on the name or wll stamped of the product the only way is to test the product to the required specification.
This is not possible for most of us pleasure boat sailors
Hi Jonathan,And, historically, was not conducted by some shackle makers themselves.
I've related the experience previously.
I tested shackle to destruction. The commonly fail at the 'eye' where the thread portion of the pin is part outside the eye. This seems logical the thread 'thins' the pin so where the pins is not fully housed the diameter of the pin is less, due to the thread.
I found that CMPs Black Pin Titan shackles did not meet specification. The supplier of the shackle determines what specification they are going to meet.
To cut a long story short. CMP rebadged their shackles as meeting a 2 (short) ton specification not the Grade B 2 metric ton specification. The difference on the shackle is that the WLL is embossed 2t, for imperial and 2T for metric. They sold, sell, their Black pin shackles, marked WLL 2t in a metric market, the UK, Europe, Australia. They updated the specification on their website. So CMP website was accurate, the 2t was correct. Its quite legal for them to sell imperially marked shackles in a metric market. Buyer beware.
Hands up anyone who noticed, hands up anyone who notices their shackles are embossed 2t not 2T and know what the difference between the 't' or 'T' means.
I will not endorse CMPs Black pin shackles. there is plenty of choice, Crosby et al. Either CMP knew their shackles did not meet the metric specification (and thought they would get away with it) OR they never tested the shackles in the first place (and relied on a nefarious test by another party). If either of these options has a basis of accuracy - what other products that CMP market enjoy the same processes?
As previously mentioned - I tested their chain, it met specification. I tested their yellow pin shackles (3/8th" shackle WLL 1T) - they met specification. But I will not endorse CMP product - there is plenty of choice from other suppliers. Maybe I'm unkind and my emotive standards are unrealistic. Their Titan Black Pin shackles do meet the 2t, 4,000lbs, specification but are (were) not Grade B WLL 2T, 2000kg, shackles.
How can I be persuaded to amend my ideas -
Giver me a credit note to source 10 shackles, 3/8th" Titan Black pin, at random from Australian chandlers, pay for the 10 shackles to be tested, under my watchful eyes, by a NATA test facility. I'll publish the results here along with the receipts for purchase and certificates from the test facility.
Jonathan
Of course UK readers would be confused, I accept the criticism.Hi Jonathan,
I am finding your post a little bit confusing, maybe things are different in Australia. Please say if you think I am wrong but my understanding of the correct marking for lifting equipment including shackles is as follows:
A metric tonne (always spelt tonne and never ton) is 1,000 kg and always has the abbreviation of a lower case t (Never upper case) This is according to International SI units and as listed in the Lifting Equipment Engineers Association Code of Practice for the safe use of lifting equipment Edition 9.
A UK Imperial ton (spelt ton) often called a long ton is approximately 1,016 kg and has the abbreviation of an upper case T. This is according to the Lifting Equipment Engineers Association Code of Practice for the safe use of lifting equipment Edition 9.
Confusion often arises because the Americans use a short ton measurement of approximately 907 kg which should be abbreviated to tn or st.
The majority of readers of this forum are probably from the UK and probably using metric weights so if they want to lift a weight not exceeding 1,000 kg they should use a shackle marked WLL 1 t. If they want to lift a weight not exceeding an imperial ton they would need to choose a shackle marked WLL 1 T.
In your post you mention "metric ton" (rather than metric tonne) and also "" WLL 2T, 2000kg" (rather than WLL 2 t, 2000 kg) which both seem to be a bit of a mix of terminology and may confuse UK readers.
Point of order: a metric ton is a tonne. A metric tonne is a tautology. Both weigh 1,000 kg.Hi Jonathan,
I am finding your post a little bit confusing, maybe things are different in Australia. Please say if you think I am wrong but my understanding of the correct marking for lifting equipment including shackles is as follows:
A metric tonne (always spelt tonne and never ton) is 1,000 kg and always has the abbreviation of a lower case t (Never upper case) This is according to International SI units and as listed in the Lifting Equipment Engineers Association Code of Practice for the safe use of lifting equipment Edition 9.
A UK Imperial ton (spelt ton) often called a long ton is approximately 1,016 kg and has the abbreviation of an upper case T. This is according to the Lifting Equipment Engineers Association Code of Practice for the safe use of lifting equipment Edition 9.
Confusion often arises because the Americans use a short ton measurement of approximately 907 kg which should be abbreviated to tn or st.
The majority of readers of this forum are probably from the UK and probably using metric weights so if they want to lift a weight not exceeding 1,000 kg they should use a shackle marked WLL 1 t. If they want to lift a weight not exceeding an imperial ton they would need to choose a shackle marked WLL 1 T.
In your post you mention "metric ton" (rather than metric tonne) and also "" WLL 2T, 2000kg" (rather than WLL 2 t, 2000 kg) which both seem to be a bit of a mix of terminology and may confuse UK readers.
Did you miss the guy with the wetted hessian sack over his crotch?The guy with the rubber gloves was the only one wearing any sort of personal protective equipment. What a sissy!
Plenty more fish (as in guy with wetted hessian sack over his crotch) in the sea.Did you miss the guy with the wetted hessian sack over his crotch?