What would happen to the Solent, Isle of Wight and Tides
- Thread starter jimi
- Start date
Cutter
Active member
who cares?
Cutter
Active member
Gordon Brown would put a charge on it. Bridge buoy wouldnt be needed. [oh really!] for the rti though!
T_S
New member
As I now live near the east coast Jim I couldn't give a toss! /forums/images/graemlins/smile.gif
Cutter
Active member
thats interesting I put bu gg er and it got changed to [oh really!] . This could be fun!
Phoenix of Hamble
Active member
Years ago I did an endurance dinghy race where you had to carry your boat across a causeway at one point.....
Be interesting to see 'em trying to lug a 70 footer over a dual carriageway......
Be interesting to see 'em trying to lug a 70 footer over a dual carriageway......
T_S
New member
'Prick' amongst some other choice words are still O'k though! /forums/images/graemlins/laugh.gif
JackFrobisher
New member
Wasn't there once a plan to do that and generate electricity from the tide ... or something? Like the French do in the Rance.
It would cock up the longshore drift of the south coast in that area. Tho Hengisbury head would be redundant. Probably the low lying areas would flood at high water and the solent would hold sewerage as it wouldn't "drain" away on the tides. In short you wouldn't win.......why do you ask?
alahol2
Well-known member
Premier would rent the Solent and make a REALLY big marina.
BrendanS
Well-known member
Fresh Water Bay would fill up with gravel within two years, and a new gravel bank about a mile offshore IoW. The current Hurst spit would start extending out to the current gravel bank. Lymington/Keyhaven salt marshes would start restoring themselves. Why do you ask?
Peppermint
New member
Re: Wouldn\'t happen.
From an engineering perspective damming would be unsound. Every effort would be made to minimize the restriction of flow to reduce lateral forces on the new structure.
These days it's unlikely that restriction of flow would meet the strict environmental requirements that would be placed on the project. The Solent being subject to a number of preservation orders to maintain habitat.
I don't know of any modeling research done on this project, I'll check though, but I would suspect that within 10 years of the damming Lymington would be closed and Southampton wouldn't be able to maintain it's 20m operating draught . 50 years on, without major dredging, Southampton wouldn't be able to operate at all. Portsmouth would probably pay for the dam.
From an engineering perspective damming would be unsound. Every effort would be made to minimize the restriction of flow to reduce lateral forces on the new structure.
These days it's unlikely that restriction of flow would meet the strict environmental requirements that would be placed on the project. The Solent being subject to a number of preservation orders to maintain habitat.
I don't know of any modeling research done on this project, I'll check though, but I would suspect that within 10 years of the damming Lymington would be closed and Southampton wouldn't be able to maintain it's 20m operating draught . 50 years on, without major dredging, Southampton wouldn't be able to operate at all. Portsmouth would probably pay for the dam.