Often referred to as “diamonds”, and very common back in the day with wooden masts and fractional (non-masthead) Bermudan rigs. Even many dinghies like Fireflies had them.It stiffens the upper portion of the mast in fractional rigging. You may pump up the backstay with less risk of breaking the last X% of the mast, and get a decent catenary in the forestay
Aren't they angled the wrong way to support a masthead asymmetric??Often referred to as “diamonds”, and very common back in the day with wooden masts and fractional (non-masthead) Bermudan rigs. Even many dinghies like Fireflies had them.
(And back in fashion with some carbon masts with massive masthead asymmetric spinnakers.)
It's a Trident 24 we might go and take a look at.Yup, jumpers. The alternative would be running backstays.
What kind of boat is it?
A friend used to have a Trident in Fleetwood marina, although his had the old Vire engine, i towed and launched his boat from Garstang to Fleetwood with an old Landy, it proved a very good boat, he visited Scotland, Wales and the IOM in it, no problems as i recall, but i think the engine gave a bit of trouble.Yes, 1GM10 engine.
No it would not. These apply pressure in a forward direction to the upper section of the mast that is above the forestay. Running backstays pull the mast back & have a different purposeYup, jumpers. The alternative would be running backstays.
What kind of boat is it?
I stand corrected!No it would not. These apply pressure in a forward direction to the upper section of the mast that is above the forestay. Running backstays pull the mast back & have a different purpose
I had them on my last 2 boats. The running backstays that I had on the first boat were attached to the point level with the forestay. This allowed me to reduce forestay sag. The main backstay went to the top of the mast & the jumpers resisted the bending that would have occured because the forestay is at a lower point.
Yes I would agree. A load forward on top of mast (Mast top spin or gennaker)would not be counteracted by jumper struts. Counteracted by back stay.Aren't they angled the wrong way to support a masthead asymmetric??
They seem to be angled the right way to enable the back stay to be tensioned to tighten the luff of the jib without bending the top of the mast back or breaking it off.
Yes, in conjunction with pre bend.Would I be in thinking that swept back spreaders reduced the need for jumpers in small boat. Seems to work ok for my 3/4 rigs.