View from Ships Bridge and more info .....

  • Thread starter Thread starter Guest
  • Start date Start date
G

Guest

Guest
Following on from my previous post giving view from ships bridge and relation to seeing yachts etc.

I have just visited another vessel and had time to discuss with Officers and Master various topics that I am sure would interest many here.

First of all interaction with Yachts .... this vessel is 100,000 ton Tanker again .. but different - traditional 90's design .... with retro-fit of later technology.

3 Data readout GPS
ECDIS Charting system
X Band and S Band full Anti-Collision / AIS capability
"Paper Chart" folios full - covering vessels expected trading area.

I took opportunity to "photo" data / diagrams displayed on bridge - to inform Pilots and also as reference when needed for Officers etc.
It was interesting that this vessel actually displayed the "blind-vision" table on the bulkhead .... : >

Image003.jpg


Now onto manoeuvring data ... a lot of posts have been made over the years about ships like this taking 3 miles to stop etc. and so on .... well here is the real data as actually measured on sea trials ......

Image001a.jpg


Image002a.jpg


(please note that I have to remove id of vessel etc. as this is commercial information)

Now in discussion with the Master and Officers - I concentrated on 2 areas .... meeting Yachts at sea / restricted waters .... and paper vs ECDIS.

As to meeting yachts ... they said that generally they had no problem and if location was without restriction - they had no problem to turn and give way if req'd. BUT they emphasised that yachts have to learn that on ship - 1/2 mile is far too close .... A point that surprised me was the Master and officers mentioned they had an incident with a number of Mobo's in a group ... 2 or 3 MOBO's were moving along and were not a problem ... (this is Solent and seriously restricted for vessels like this) .... then without warning first one MOBO then others opened throttles .. cut across ships bow and disappeared from view "under the bow" ..... In the Masters words ..... "Word filtered" !! He added a comment at the end .... which I feel summed it up .... "there's room for all on the water ... just pay attention to whats around and also others limits .... cut it too fine and it's the last time you do ..."

Onto Charting .... the Second Officer and Master played biggest part in this of course ..... the ECDIS system they had was Transas Maritime on dedicated PC system. The charting being Vector based. Updates to Vector layers / details were received via CD disk at approx. 2 week intervals. It was admitted that the ECDIS often lagged behind the paper charts in corrections. The Paper Charts were corrected by supply of tracings from Chart agency. The Paper Charts were the registered Main Chart System of the vessel.
What was interesting was that the vessel had a change of chart system in the past - based on officers request .... removal of ARC's Raster system and replaced by full Vector. I was surprised as this is not a cheap exercise .... but the Officers were very pleased and were unanimous on this vessel that they would prefer Vector to Raster.

Ok onto the ship itself ....

LOA : 246.8m Breadth : 42.0m Depth : 21.3m Summer Load Draft : 14.798m Gross Tonnage : 58,118 T Nett Tonnage : 31,909 T Light Ship : 16,657 T Summer Deadweight : 107,215 T at Displacement average 123,872 T

Air drafts Ford Mast 36.45m Aft Main Mast : 48.67m

Draft aft to fully immerse propellor req'd = 8.27m

Main Engine : 18,395 HP driving 4 blade fixed propellor of 7.2m diameter. Service speed designed 14.75 kts. Range at full speed on full fuel : 22900 nm

Anchors : Admiralty Cast (AC-14 Stockless) 2. Each at 10 T with 13 schackles of chain each.

Generators : 3 sets at 750 Kw each. Capable of simultaneous or individual coupling.

Cargo Pumps - 3 Main pumps each capable of 2,500 cu.m each per hour and deliver to 10 bar backpressure.

Final word .... If there is any question that any of YOU lot on the forums would like answered by Ships Officers / Masters I meet ... then please PM me and I'll see what I can do ...

I hope I can find another avenue / data report to post later given another opportunity ......
 
Nigel, you may have commented on this before but do you know if there is any reason why not to install cameras to look downwards into the blind spot?

Obviously there's a cost implication but surely that would be just a drop in the ocean, so to speak.
 
Cameras ??

If anything gets into that area - they are far too close anyway ...

But imagine this ship plugging away at 14 - 15 kts ... when loaded and even when in ballast - waves break over that bow that rip fittings off ... would kill any person up there on deck. What chance a camera ?

When vessel is proceeding in restricted channel under pilotage to berth - it is normal for a watch to be posted if not entire mooring team on bow and stern.

Practical idea to fit camera ? Nope not really ... would never survive.
 
Before anyone asks ......

The Officers and Masters Nationalities ... are not UK ...

The two vessels I have used for posts on here are mixed nationality crew and officers ... the views and comments made by them ... the work that I have Superintended with them has been excellent. Basically the old comments about x and x nationality do not bear out fact ....
 
Re: Cameras ??

I was thinking of built into the hull structure under armoured glass so as not to be capable of moving independently and thus being washed away rather than mounted on the deck.
 
Well done Nigel, I give this post of the month.
I still could't read those pesky stopping characteristics though.
 
I suppose a good rule for mobo-ers must be that if you can't see the bridge of the ship, they can't see you. Or rather, given that you don't want to try out that rule: Always make sure you can see the bridge. Slightly different for sailyboats but still not a bad rule of thumb.
 
[ QUOTE ]
Main Engine : 18,395 HP driving 4 blade fixed propellor of 7.2m diameter. Service speed designed 14.75 kts. Range at full speed on full fuel : 22900 nm

[/ QUOTE ]
Truly amazing...

Thanks for inputting something not seen everyday.
 
Was that 3.5 miles for a turning circle? No wonder they get nervous with jerks dodging across their bows in the Solent!

Also, over 6mins from full ahead to full astern. At 15knts that's about a mile . . . .

Very useful & informative - also a salutory lesson in keeping out of the way of the big boys!
 
[ QUOTE ]
Officers were very pleased and were unanimous on this vessel that they would prefer Vector to Raster

[/ QUOTE ]

So do most professionals.
 
Could you clarify the turning circles. What is the distance and the speed at which they are tested?

My experience is that ships at full speed can turn very fast. They can not stop but they can turn. Also after one story from San Francisco Golden gate entrance some ships are unstable for high speed turns! A pilot got it wrong on the way in.
 
Apology on Photo Quality ...

I only had my Camera-Mobile with me - so they are lacking definition.
I will try and take better on next one .....

What I found interesting was the general view on there that they would if safe to do so - would alter course for a yacht !! Let me explain why I was surprised ........

A ship like this is proceeding on auto-pilot most of it's life for 2 main reasons : a) It relieves the need for an extra person to be on bridge, b) It saves fuel and also steers a better course .... by using less and less rudder movements as it learns sea-state etc. The OOW would alter course normally by dialing in the req'd number of degrees .... or of in Channel - usually on Hand steering - by giving order to helmsman. The change of course is done with minimum rudder to prevent cavitation on engine intakes or disruption of services. It also puts immense strain on the ships structure to give large rudder orders at speed. Give a xxx 20 order at more than half speed and everyone on board will know !!
 
Turning circles ...

Yes the fast ship turns better than a slow one ... it's same as a yacht in fact ... but of course vastly greater difference.

I have tried to extract data from the picturs but they are unclear ... I will try and get other more readable on next ship I attend ... I only attend when all my Inspectors are occupied on other ships !!

Stability in turn ... now we are talking about top-hamper ships such as Car-carriers, Container ships etc. which are much faster and carry high stacked cargo.

The main thing to remember is that the ship has a large advance and slip as the turn starts ... the water flattens on the inside of the turn for a long way as the ship slides .... but once turn gets developing - the turn tightens ... this is why a Williamson Turn was developed by Lt. Williamson of US Navy ...

Normal tests are carried out at Full Sea Speed on proving trials when leaving builders ...
 
Re: Turning circles ...

I remember watching the McBraynes car ferry out of Oban turning round the North of the island leaving Oban. It had a really dodgy looking list - I think someone said it had been designed for use elsewhere and, when McBraynes picked up the dropped order, they had an extra deck added which gave it a tad too much tophamper. It doesn't seem to have fallen over yet tho'
 
[ QUOTE ]
I suppose a good rule for mobo-ers must be that if you can't see the bridge of the ship, they can't see you. Or rather, given that you don't want to try out that rule: Always make sure you can see the bridge. Slightly different for sailyboats but still not a bad rule of thumb.

[/ QUOTE ]

Bit like trucks... "If you cant see my mirrors, I cant see you!"
 
Under the bow ....

There are a couple of points that need airing here I think ...

If you do grop into a ships blind area ahead ...

1. You are far too close
2. You are only seconds away from disaster
3. The ship has no idea what it can do (best IMHO is to keep on course etc. hoping that YOU do the right thing).
4. Long before you disappeared you became part of the radar sea-clutter
5. IF you do collide - it is most likely that not only will hull be smashed by the steel hull of the ship - but also rolled over violently - as ships bulbous bows are designed to roll the water ahead, build up a "wave" ahead to break the "drag" of the water down the hull .... It is unlikely that you will suffer a "glancing" blow ... unless ship at slow speed ...

Let's add another sobering thought ..... the time it would take someone to walk forward to "have a look" over the bow would be greater than the total time you have left to get out of the way ... and we are talking when still ahead of the blind sector !!! Put it simply .... the guy would still be walking fwd while you disappear under the ship.
 
Re: Under the bow .... 2

The comment made on this ship about the MOBO incident was sobering ... and let's be honest whether mobo or rag ... we have all seen the boat that just starts up and turns etc. without looking ..... imagine this though .... they as a group - not just one ...... did it under the bow of a 100,000 ton tanker .... now that has to be stupid !

As to mobo and rag being different ref. being ahead and seeing the bridge ... why ? To me both are risking life and vessel and should get away as fast and as obvious as possible. A raggie may consider that the size and viz. of his sails is good .... but that is only relative ... to you they are big - to the ships bridge they are small white handkerchiefs amongst the white wave crests etc.
 
Top