They hadn't released richter scales when I was driving back, only that it was substantial and that tsunami warnings had been issued. First report I read when I got home said Japan’s Meteorological Agency measured the quake at magnitude 8.5 -that's a pretty severe earthquake, and some large waves can be expected.
Anything over 8 is considered to be a 'great' earthquake, and the Pacific Tsunami Warning Center said the quake had the "potential to generate a widely destructive tsunami in the ocean or seas near the earthquake."
I wonder why they chose such a confusing logarithmic scale for measuring earthquakes. Just imagine a Beaufort scale where a F9 was 10 times worse than a F8.
the same reason as for any scientific use of logarithmic scales. If you are comparing wind forces, they only occur over quite a small range, so it is possible to draw linear graphs where low measurements can be plotted on the same scale as large ones.
Earthquakes however occur over such a huge range, that a graph of high level measurements, say 8 or 9 Richter, lower level earthquakes wouldn't even appear as a squiggle, making comparison difficult. By plotting on a logarithmic scales, you can compare different earthquake events (such as after shocks) on one graph.