capnsensible
Well-known member
Rapido 53XS First Look: A trimaran with proper living spaces for comfortable sailing
Might have appeal for trimaran fans with deep pockets!
Might have appeal for trimaran fans with deep pockets!
Speeds into the mid 20kn are available, which is a wee bit faster than you want to go on any cruising yacht. Never a truer word spoken. But it’s there, and nobody said you have to drive it that hard. We reef primarily for comfort when cruising, as I’d regard about 15 knots as the comfort limit on ours, though we have exceeded 20 when racing, and very occasionally, by accident, cruising. That was entering Poole harbour against a spring ebb in a F5 SE wind, surfing. I’m sure the Rapido is a fine yacht. Not sure what headway they expect to make against Gunboats, Dazcats, Outremar etc, which do much the same but with even more space.
Me alsoWhatever the negatives are, doesn't stop me from wanting a go on one!!
I speak of mental comfort and dryness. We are a fairly dry boat up to that, then it gets very very wet. At 18kn the bow wave off the lee ama is up to the sail numbers, sheets of spray float off to leeward, and about 10ft behind the boat you get a powerboat style rooster tail. If a wave hits the windward float, which will be about a metre plus out of the water, it’s kind of blown to bits. Most of which will go down your neck.Is it slamming or bumpiness that is unpleasant when cruising above 15 kts?
Does that include really big seas say 4M and breaking? How would you cope in such conditions downwind?I speak of mental comfort and dryness. We are a fairly dry boat up to that, then it gets very very wet. At 18kn the bow wave off the lee ama is up to the sail numbers, sheets of spray float off to leeward, and about 10ft behind the boat you get a powerboat style rooster tail. If a wave hits the windward float, which will be about a metre plus out of the water, it’s kind of blown to bits. Most of which will go down your neck.
Modrrn cats and tris don’t pitchpole unless committing acts of total foolishness, getting vain about the speed. Once we are getting close to the magic 20 barrier, it’s sheets in hand, experienced multi helms only, I wouldn’t even trust the good Captain here even though he’s clearly a proper sailor and sensible with it. Realising how had you are pressing is a black art. Hand steering is needed if you’re pressing, but if you’re comfortably reefed, the autopilot copes fine, and you’re still at nearly double mono speed if you wish. Ours flexes a little, the new generation DFs do not, or not nearly as much. Big cats don’t, unless they’re lagoons with loose bulkheads. Farrier tris are very stiff too. Our bows deflect an inch or so as they punch into a wave, basically. We have never had any form of bows down incident, even when deliberately pressing as hard as possible.
Match your speed to the waves and you’ll be supremely indifferent. You’ll be hand steering mind you. Going upwind in those conditions is for more stalwart spirits than Mrs C and I. And we are probably more hardened than most. We did once beat out of Burnham on C into a beastly easterly, about 25kn base wind, and it was indeed beastly. My 3 year old son was most upset because one of his teddies got wet, through the closed hatch. I’ll get my GoPro out next year, unless any of ypu lot come past Yarmouth, itks the nearest you can get. Obviously things the size of that Rapido push everything up a notch or 2 weather wise, we have been pleasantly surprised by the difference between 27ft and 30ft 6.Does that include really big seas say 4M and breaking? How would you cope in such conditions downwind?
That's the problem with them for someone like me that enjoyed offshore cruising where at times you will encounter difficult conditions that can last for a day and often more. My old boats and many other monos you could set the wind vane or autopilot and retreat out of the weather, it sounds like even if dropping your speed on a trip you have to hand steer, that for even a two handed cruising couple would be extremely difficult and ultimately not possible. So for me as a cruising yachtsman they begin to fall into very fast coastal cruisers admittedly where the coast can be 200 miles away and weather routing and accessibility being paramount. Interesting though.Match your speed to the waves and you’ll be supremely indifferent. You’ll be hand steering mind you. Going upwind in those conditions is for more stalwart spirits than Mrs C and I. And we are probably more hardened than most. We did once beat out of Burnham on C into a beastly easterly, about 25kn base wind, and it was indeed beastly. My 3 year old son was most upset because one of his teddies got wet, through the closed hatch. I’ll get my GoPro out next year, unless any of ypu lot come past Yarmouth, itks the nearest you can get. Obviously things the size of that Rapido push everything up a notch or 2 weather wise, we have been pleasantly surprised by the difference between 27ft and 30ft 6.
There’s something in what you say. You need a big multi for ocean safety, which might then be fine with a vane or electrical ‘steer to wind’. But all the gear gets exponentially heavy. Against that, theres the room for more crew without walking over each others underwear, but you might not want to cruise with others. We like it best with just the 2 of us. I reckon that Rapido would be fine with vane or auto steering, but it’s bloody huge, really. A 35 foot tri like Angus’s is still not really an ocean crossing boat to my mind, though no doubt he’ll add something if he sees the thread. However, I don’t doubt ypu’d step off our boat with a big smile on your face. And provided it wasn’t blowing old boots, ladies love them too. For their design purpose, smaller multis ate unbeatable. Ours is plated for that 200 miles, it’s great to play in that zone. Which is what we do.That's the problem with them for someone like me that enjoyed offshore cruising where at times you will encounter difficult conditions that can last for a day and often more. My old boats and many other monos you could set the wind vane or autopilot and retreat out of the weather, it sounds like even if dropping your speed on a trip you have to hand steer, that for even a two handed cruising couple would be extremely difficult and ultimately not possible. So for me as a cruising yachtsman they begin to fall into very fast coastal cruisers admittedly where the coast can be 200 miles away and weather routing and accessibility being paramount. Interesting though.
To be honest I was wondering how capable in terms of my questions a DF40 would be.There’s something in what you say. You need a big multi for ocean safety, which might then be fine with a vane or electrical ‘steer to wind’. But all the gear gets exponentially heavy. Against that, theres the room for more crew without walking over each others underwear, but you might not want to cruise with others. We like it best with just the 2 of us. I reckon that Rapido would be fine with vane or auto steering, but it’s bloody huge, really. A 35 foot tri like Angus’s is still not really an ocean crossing boat to my mind, though no doubt he’ll add something if he sees the thread.
Funnily enough, there’s a chap over on Sailing Anarchy (predominantly USA sailor’s forum) who is blue water cruising a DF 39(?). The problem he’s having is a lack of load carrying capacity. When you load it up with all the long term cruising clobber you’re back to monohull sort of speeds.To be honest I was wondering how capable in terms of my questions a DF40 would be.
That's always going to be a problem I think, a 4 or 5 day maximum at sea but that potentially could get you a long way, certainly to the Azores for instance. Then you are into restocking, power ( electrical) might be an issue but Lithium should go a long way to solving that, a water maker would be essential to cut down on tankage and weight. In other words it's doable but it isn't going to be luxurious.Funnily enough, there’s a chap over on Sailing Anarchy (predominantly USA sailor’s forum) who is blue water cruising a DF 39(?). The problem he’s having is a lack of load carrying capacity. When you load it up with all the long term cruising clobber you’re back to monohull sort of speeds.
A 1200. Not the finest DF. The 40 is quicker, carries more load, and more advanced design for offshore work. More is relative to the 1200, not to a Halberg Rassey.Funnily enough, there’s a chap over on Sailing Anarchy (predominantly USA sailor’s forum) who is blue water cruising a DF 39(?). The problem he’s having is a lack of load carrying capacity. When you load it up with all the long term cruising clobber you’re back to monohull sort of speeds.