The Alinghi factor

Rob_Webb

Active member
Joined
20 May 2002
Messages
1,478
Location
Auckland
Visit site
Same old Americas Cup dirty tricks. The only difference being this time it's the European holders rather than the yanks!

From the NZ media in Valencia:

There's a strong rumour doing the rounds in Valencia: If Alinghi win the 32nd America's Cup, skipper Brad Butterworth will not be allowed to accept it. Syndicate boss Ernesto Bertarelli will.

With a question mark over Butterworth's continued employment with Alinghi after this regatta, the rumours say that Bertarelli has opted to reduce the spotlight on Butterworth, with the future in mind.

We may have to wait to see if Alinghi wins and if any of this happens - but this is just one of the examples of how Alinghi have taken their public relations and communications strategy to a new level in what is shaping up to be one of the most heavily propagandised Cups in history.

Some of the posturing, micro-management and spin being imparted by Alinghi is unparalleled, even for the America's Cup.

Latest example: The Losers' Press Conference.

This one was nipped in the bud but the Swiss had to get organised ahead of Monday's postponed race seven in case Alinghi won and the Cup presentation was held.

They planned to hold two press conferences simultaneously after the winning race.

At one, Alinghi would attend a winner's press conference.

At the other, Team NZ would attend the losers' press conference. Not only does this fly in the face of aeons of America's Cup tradition - the two teams are always at the end of the match to shake hands after a long battle.

It also reveals a mindset increasingly obvious to journalists covering the Cup but which is far less discernible by the real targets - the readers and viewers at the end of the line.

Who in their right mind would attend a loser's press conference? Who in their right mind would propose holding one at the same time as a winner's press conference?

It was an obvious ploy to focus most of the world's media attention on Alinghi and to keep Team NZ squarely out of frame. Team NZ were not consulted about these plans and found out second-hand.

If the press conference had gone ahead and Team NZ failed to win the Cup, they would not have attended anyway.

The common factor in all this is Kiwis.

Not just the Kiwis in Team NZ but even the Kiwis in the Alinghi camp. At times in Port America's Cup, anything New Zealand, it seems, is a rival with a capital R and needs to be carefully controlled.

There's nothing overt or bitter or rude about the atmosphere at the Port - it's just that Alinghi do not want the Kiwis' America's Cup expertise to overshadow them and have put together an under-the-counter PR strategy to deal with it.

That strategy has gone too far, over the top.

Like the Losers' Press Conference.

The other key element is that, for the first time in many years, sponsor Louis Vuitton is not in charge of communicating the America's Cup to the world.

Instead of Louis Vuitton and the affable Bruno Trouble running the media centre and working with the world's media, Ernesto Bertarelli set up a company called America's Cup Management (ACM) to do it instead.

Some of ACM's media management has been, shall we say, direct, particularly with the electronic media.

Those TV pictures you have been watching through this thrilling regatta come from America's Cup TV, the host broadcaster, operated by ACM.

TVNZ use Peter Montgomery, John McBeth and James Spithill as commentators over those pictures.

But many millions of people around the world listen to the commentary provided by America's Cup TV commentators - Kiwis Martin Tasker and yachting commentator Peter Lester, in coverage produced by Leon Sefton, son of Alan Sefton, a communications man from previous New Zealand America's Cup campaigns.

All that you are about to read was not told me by Tasker, Lester nor Sefton.

But it is common knowledge among the media ranks here. ACTV didn't want Kiwis originally - there's that thing again - and tried to hire other broadcasters before realising that New Zealand has actually managed to put together the world's best coverage of America's Cup sailing through the last two regattas.

It's the same in rugby, where New Zealand's television coverage of the game is the world's best. But, from day one, the ACM/ACTV controlling hand fell heavily on the shoulder.

Tasker and Lester - who also writes for the Herald and nzherald.co.nz - have been taken to task on a regular basis for being too biased in favour of Team New Zealand. On day one, the complaints started.

Too much Team NZ.

For anyone who heard the ACTV commentaries (they are beamed into the media centre here), this was a ridiculous call.

Tasker and Lester are professionals, and good ones.

If there was any bias in their work, I couldn't pick it.

On the second day, Tasker and Lester tried to correct matters in the second race.

Then they received complaints from various Kiwis that they were leaning too far towards Alinghi. But unless this sounds too much like "a TV commentator can never keep everyone happy", story there is a darker side to this.

Tasker and Lester have been placed pretty much on threat of dismissal if they don't removed the alleged bias (which no-one else can hear) from their commentaries.

Still dissatisfied, ACTV brought in Ian Burns, an Australian designer who has been linked with Alinghi's next America's Cup campaign - to provide balance.

In one commentary, Lester was heard talking about Ed Baird and how Brad Butterworth had said Baird was one of only five men who could sail an America's Cup yacht at the top level.

Lester set about naming the other four.

One was Russell Coutts. The next day, knuckles were rapped.

We do not talk about Russell Coutts on ACTV, apparently.

Not since he left Alinghi.

Then came the day of the infamous protest and the sight of a man up Alinghi's mast quickening thoughts that the defender might have breached class rules.

The Team NZ protest was dismissed but suspicions remain. When the incident occurred, the ACTV boat which follows closely behind filming was told to drop back.

Later, ACTV were cutting a highlights package for broadcast around the world. Orders from the top arrived.

A large chunk of the mast sequence in the package was pruned, leaving a package which made Alinghi appear to be not quite so seriously in question. Welcome to the America's Cup.

But remember, the pictures you have been watching - and ACTV's commentary if you happen to be hearing that - come to you freshly approved.

By Alinghi.
 

Judders

Active member
Joined
19 Jul 2005
Messages
2,514
Location
Hampshire
Visit site
What is it about Kiwis? Nice people when you meet them but total tossers about sport if they lose.

Australia proved on saturday that when McCaw and Heyman are not allowed to referee, the ABs are average. We all know they'll bottle it at the World Cup because they always do...
 

Rob_Webb

Active member
Joined
20 May 2002
Messages
1,478
Location
Auckland
Visit site
[ QUOTE ]
What is it about Kiwis? Nice people when you meet them but total tossers about sport if they lose.

Australia proved on saturday that when McCaw and Heyman are not allowed to referee, the ABs are average. We all know they'll bottle it at the World Cup because they always do...

[/ QUOTE ]

You should read a few books about the history of the AC and the behaviour of previous American defenders before you pronounce kiwis as 'tossers'.

Meanwhile, ladies and gentleman, let's all put our hands together for the British entry for the Americas Cup.... [empty silence]... What! You mean their isn't one???? How embarrasing!

And if you really want to compare the distasteful habits of losing teams and their supporters, let's take a look at English football fans, shall we? Maybe you are one of them, Judders? 'Tossers' is probably far too mild a word, don't you think?

And you really want to talk rugby? For sure England are looking a sure-fire certainty to retain the RWC, aren't they? Yeah right. /forums/images/graemlins/laugh.gif
 

ranga

New member
Joined
3 Sep 2001
Messages
76
Location
Adelaide, South Australia
Visit site
It's mainly kiwis giving the Swiss the opportunity of winning and defending the cup. Hopefully if the Swiss pi$$ you kiwis off enough then you might all just concentrate on working for your own country and not against it. Being passionate about the AC was so much more enjoyable when aussies sailed on aussie boats, kiwis on kiwi boats and yanks on american boats.
 

Metabarca

Well-known member
Joined
23 Aug 2002
Messages
7,331
Location
Friuli Venezia Giulia
Visit site
I have had it from the horse's mouth (Troublé) that LV has indeed not seen eye to eye with AC Management on a number of things and are reconsidering their involvement in the cup...
 

Judders

Active member
Joined
19 Jul 2005
Messages
2,514
Location
Hampshire
Visit site
[ QUOTE ]
For sure England are looking a sure-fire certainty to retain the RWC, aren't they? ...

[/ QUOTE ]

Moving swiftly on... /forums/images/graemlins/blush.gif
 

DJE

Well-known member
Joined
21 Jun 2004
Messages
7,654
Location
Fareham
www.casl.uk.com
Thoroughly nasty people those Swiss. What a shame they have such a fast boat.

Anybody care to add up the total number of British challengers in the history of the cup and compare them with the total number of Kiwi challengers? Might be interesting.
 

Major Catastrophe

New member
Joined
31 May 2005
Messages
24,466
Visit site
100-1152F.jpg


This is good for removing both chips a the same time.
 

Rob_Webb

Active member
Joined
20 May 2002
Messages
1,478
Location
Auckland
Visit site
[ QUOTE ]
"How embarrassing!"

Not at all. Rather pleased that we haven't been suckered into the sh*t fight, dick measuring, money ridden media circus you're so volubly complaining about. Or are you just getting NZ's excuses in early?

[/ QUOTE ]

Excuses for what? Winning the LV cup and putting in a superb challenge effort against Alinghi, wherher we win or lose?

More like you should be putting in early excuses for the undoubted p!ss poor campaign that the GB Origin challenge will put together in the next cup. Think team China.
 

Rob_Webb

Active member
Joined
20 May 2002
Messages
1,478
Location
Auckland
Visit site
Well honestly, do you really expect GB to put together a credible challenge???!!!

Maybe dust down Peter de Savary and have another go!
 

Judders

Active member
Joined
19 Jul 2005
Messages
2,514
Location
Hampshire
Visit site
And so we see ladies and gentlemen, the deep seated, if not unlovable, personality flaws that turn the All Black's into losers when it matters.
 

Rob_Webb

Active member
Joined
20 May 2002
Messages
1,478
Location
Auckland
Visit site
But GB are joining in. Your only glimmer of hope will be having Ben Ainslie but it still takes 2-3 campaigns to build up a serious challenge so I wouldn't worry about having to host an AC event in UK waters for a few decades yet (the geography of the coastline will have changed by then)! /forums/images/graemlins/smile.gif
 

Judders

Active member
Joined
19 Jul 2005
Messages
2,514
Location
Hampshire
Visit site
Britain never could host an AC in the current era as the AC sailors only sail when conditions are perfect. That is a huge part of why, to my lament, there is a lack of interest (and thus sponsorship) for the event in the UK. The British sailing public demand seamanship, guts and the ability to react to the elements, none of which are present (to a sufficient degree) in the AC.
 
Top