It is quite easy to have a BBQ and keep it under control. No need to go over the top. I fear calling the police would have been wasted effort and threatening such should be discouraged.Some years ago a neighbour was out on her horse in our local forest when she encountered a group of people about to light a bbq. ..at a time when there were notices about proclaiming the area to be a severe fire hazard. She threatened to call the police if they did. That stopped them.
It is quite easy to have a BBQ and keep it under control. No need to go over the top. I fear calling the police would have been wasted effort and threatening such should be discouraged.
For those uneducated who don’t know what “weltanschauug” is.You clearly don't know how the local police and natives feel about fires in Greece. The cause was fireworks not a barbecue; they are much less controllable and affect a far wider area.
If another person sees a crime about to be committed it's not your job to decide whether they should be "discouraged" from calling the police, or not. You are trying to impose your highly personal social philosophy and Weltanschauung on other people, without attempting to empathise.
That's rightFor those uneducated who don’t know what “weltanschauug” is.
I quote
Weltanschauung is the fundamental cognitive orientation of an individual or society encompassing the whole of the individual's or society's knowledge, culture, and point of view.
All clear now?
And yet in some areas of extremely high fire risk authorities have decided to make that illegal, presumably because:It is quite easy to have a BBQ and keep it under control. No need to go over the top. I fear calling the police would have been wasted effort and threatening such should be discouraged.
My comment and the post I commented on was in the UK.You clearly don't know how the local police and natives feel about fires in Greece. The cause was fireworks not a barbecue; they are much less controllable and affect a far wider area.
If another person sees a crime about to be committed it's not your job to decide whether they should be "discouraged" from calling the police, or not. You are trying to impose your highly personal social philosophy and Weltanschauung on other people, without attempting to empathise.
So squit in my world. Spouted by people who don’t live in the real worldFor those uneducated who don’t know what “weltanschauug” is.
I quote
Weltanschauung is the fundamental cognitive orientation of an individual or society encompassing the whole of the individual's or society's knowledge, culture, and point of view.
All clear now?
Not the case with regard to the post I commented on. It was just the post of a Busy BodyAnd yet in some areas of extremely high fire risk authorities have decided to make that illegal, presumably because:
I'm pretty sure that in the highest periods of fire risk the police would rather get a call to someone lighting a BBQ in a stupid area than have to deal with their part of managing a major wild fire.
- not everyone will do it safely
- its unlikely that everyone who says its "quite easy" actually really understands the risks
- if some people are seen to do it, it seems to make it OK for others who maybe less competent
- if the area is that high risk there are probably forest rangers / fire fighters etc patrolling looking for smoke - and their time is best used investigating / responding to real fires than someone's burgers
- the consequences of a "small likelihood*" event are so great that the restriction on freedom so that you can't have open flames *IN A FOREST* when its tinder dry are a fair trade off.
Mmmmm something not quite right - the crew are arrested but those who hired the boat leave the country seemingly untroubled..... can't imagine the engineer or the maids had much to do with the matter beyond 'by association'
I think you need to exchange the word leave to fledMmmmm something not quite right - the crew are arrested but those who hired the boat leave the country seemingly untroubled..... can't imagine the engineer or the maids had much to do with the matter beyond 'by association'
Of course I don’t know the detail but had some experience of this in South Korea a couple of months backMmmmm something not quite right - the crew are arrested but those who hired the boat leave the country seemingly untroubled..... can't imagine the engineer or the maids had much to do with the matter beyond 'by association'
The post you replied to clearly said it was in a forest with no BBQ signs everywhere… how can you possibly know it was a “busy body” and not an area of particular risk and that the BBQers were perfectly safe?Not the case with regard to the post I commented on. It was just the post of a Busy Body
It did strike me as odd that there were so many arrests - but you have to be careful with press reports, and with making assumptions about what the word arrest means in different countries. It may well be several of them are released without charge.Mmmmm something not quite right - the crew are arrested but those who hired the boat leave the country seemingly untroubled..... can't imagine the engineer or the maids had much to do with the matter beyond 'by association'