Suez Canal warship transit.

Wonderful to see the Grey Funnel Line with proper jets on board again. Long overdue.

On a different note, Poignard's pic of Gambia shows her with a long line slung obver the side. I recently saw the same thing on Defender. What's it for? A boat-rope perhaps?

And what a fabulous pic of Victorious with such a varied air-group on board - Seahawks (or Scimitars?) Skyraider AEW, Sea Vixen and not a helo in sight!
 
I think Victorious had AEW Gannets, Buccaneers and possibly Scimiters in those days. But the photo does seem to show Sea Vixens on the stern. Yes, the rope is for a seaboat.
 
I think Victorious had AEW Gannets, Buccaneers and possibly Scimiters in those days. But the photo does seem to show Sea Vixens on the stern. Yes, the rope is for a seaboat.
We were steaming along the South Coast when some senior officer from the Fleet Air Decided to pay a visit in his own light aircraft. I can't remember what it was, an Auster perhaps. Needless to say, when he left he wasn't catapulted off.
 
I think Victorious had AEW Gannets, Buccaneers and possibly Scimiters in those days. But the photo does seem to show Sea Vixens on the stern. Yes, the rope is for a seaboat.
I see Scimitars, Sea Venoms and Skyraiders; the FAA was in a state of flux in the 1950s.
I've been through there on HMS Gambia and Victorious. I wonder if they will allow a gully-gully man on board.


View attachment 118437
Was Ned's Atomic Dustbin(the 984 radar) working?
 
Was Ned's Atomic Dustbin(the 984 radar) working?
It was rotating. Were I to say whether it actually worked or not might put me in breach of The Official Secrets Act. :ROFLMAO:

I hope I am not revealing anything I shouldn't if I said the newly installed air conditioning failed when we entered the Med. Not very pleasant as all the portholes had been blanked off. :(
 
Last edited:
Wonderful to see the Grey Funnel Line with proper jets on board again. Long overdue.

On a different note, Poignard's pic of Gambia shows her with a long line slung obver the side. I recently saw the same thing on Defender. What's it for? A boat-rope perhaps?

And what a fabulous pic of Victorious with such a varied air-group on board - Seahawks (or Scimitars?) Skyraider AEW, Sea Vixen and not a helo in sight!
The boat-rope (one each side) was attached to the 27' Montagu whalers which were always ready to be launched at short notice in case of a man overboard. Without that the whaler would sheer broadside on when it hit the water and capsize.
 
Be funny if someone!!!- "accidentally" had 2 of its container ships run aground in the canal as she was going through. One in front & one behind.
Just to show how easy it would be to trap an aircraft carrier & just to make a statement " by mistake"
Presumably the canal is still full of other traffic whilst the carrier is there
Hope that is not considered too political :unsure:
 
Last edited:
Be funny if someone!!!- "accidentally" had 2 of its container ships run aground in the canal as she was going through. One in front & one behind.
Just to show how easy it would be to trap an aircraft carrier & just to make a statement " by mistake"
Presumably the canal is still full of other traffic whilst the carrier is there
Hope that is not considered too political :unsure:

IIRC, warships normally go very near or at the front of the southbound convoy. They then go last on the northbound convoy which avoids them anchoring in the Bitter Lakes meaning they leapfrog to the front.
 
IIRC, warships normally go very near or at the front of the southbound convoy. They then go last on the northbound convoy which avoids them anchoring in the Bitter Lakes meaning they leapfrog to the front.
So traffic in the canal is organised in convoys? Not as a continuous stream. Is that correct?
Why would that be? Surely piracy is not an issue & they all have pilots.
Or is it a case that they go north for a few days & south for a few days because they cannot pass?
 
So traffic in the canal is organised in convoys? Not as a continuous stream. Is that correct?
Why would that be? Surely piracy is not an issue & they all have pilots anyway.
Or is it a case that they go north for a few days & south for a few days because they cannot pass?
Yes, two convoys a day, one northbound and one southbound. It is becase there isn't room to pass except in the Bitter Lakes so the convoys meet there.

The Suez Navigation Rules are here if you are interested:SCA - Rules of Navigation
 
Just realised on my last trip through (HMS Portland, 2009) there was an Evergreen ship at anchor in the lakes! Company name didn't mean anything then of course.

Suez 2.jpgSuez.jpg
 
Evergreen meant something to some of us, if not to the RN. Back in 1980s Hong Kong we used to call the Evergreen cadet ship “the most frightening sight in shipping”. Not because there was anything wrong with her - there never was - but because the twin bridges were halfway down the deck and astern of them was accommodation for two hundred cadets. YF Chang knew where he was going.
 
Top