Stabilised binoculars

MapisM

Well-Known Member
Joined
11 Mar 2002
Messages
20,678
Visit site
I had the opportunity to try the Fujinon stabilised binoculars in the past, and I was really impressed.
Otoh, I've always thought that my old 7x50 stuff was good enough for its job, and that it wasn't worth forking out the silly money that these things cost.
But at the end of last season, my old bino eventually went belly up, so I had a look around the web to see if I could find a Fuji at a decent (well, almost) price.
And I did find one at $800. Still far too expensive for a bino I hear you saying, and I don't disagree, but a sort of good deal when compared to the 12 hundreds bucks street price - not to mention the EU prices...
So, I convinced swmbo to anticipate my birthday present, and I had it delivered to the US, in view of a trip which we were going to make.
Now, I just had the opportunity to try it out a bit, while driving around the Alaskan outdoors.
And all I can say is that I had indeed good reasons to be impressed, the first time I tried it!
The stabilisation is simply spectacular, and at 14x it makes the difference between being actually able to see what you're looking at or not.
I've been able to read clearly some road names at a distance where without the bino I could barely see the whole sign.
And without the stabilization, there was just no way to be able to read the letters on it.
Unfortunately, these Fujinon things are much harder to find than the Canon IS stuff.
And they are somewhat more expensive too, though not much when comparing like-for-like specs.
In fact, if anyone is considering the similarly priced 15x Canon, there's simply no comparison: the Fuji stabilization is in an entirely different league.
And I would definitely recommend also anyone looking at the 12x Canon to give the Fujinon a try first. The difference is well worth the price difference, imho.
Probably, the much lower price tag of the 10x Canon is the only sensible alternative, in terms of price/performance. But as always, you get what you pay for.
Here's the only review of the thing which I found on the web, just in case anyone's interested.
http://www.kenrockwell.com/fuji/fujinon-14x40.htm
Glad to answer any questions you might have, as far as I can.
 
seriously interested as alway's with these toy's,
but I have to ignore this one, because I still have quite a few toy's / present's that I didn't even completely unpack yet
ao a Gopro, a very nice musical instrument, and a brand new Iphone6; still orriginally packed here right in front of me since new year :(

much more important things on hand right now :) :)
 
I have always fancied a pair of these binoculars but not bought them because I am unsure how they would perform at say 20 knots. Have you had a chance to try them while travelling in a boat and if so, how well do they work. I know that sailors rave about them, but 6 knots is a lot less bumpy than 25, so a motorboater's opinion would be great.
 
Nope, I haven't tried them onboard yet.
Actually, I did the first time I had the opportunity to try them, but that was quite some years ago, and just for some minutes - though as I said I was indeed impressed.
Time being, I've only tried them on the land, but also from a moving car - which in some respects is even worse than a boat. And even then, the stabilisation is still brilliant.
By turning it on and off, you can easily understand that such high magnification binoculars would be practically impossible to use hand held, and while moving.
 
and a brand new Iphone6; still orriginally packed here right in front of me since new year :(
Blimey B, does your Santa know someone at Apple R&D? :D
Glad to bring the thing at the FdC 2013, if you wish to give it a try...
 
As I mentioned before on another thread (am I allowed to repeat myself occasionally at my age...not really...too young, but I'm going to do it anyway because it is relevant....

A friend of mine is developing a Gyro stabiliser for cameras (which will work equally well for binos and telescopes). It is primarily aimed at the aerial photography industry, but would be great for boats too. They are prototyping, hence the massive tube under the camera in the link, but the final version will be a lot smaller.

http://www.gyroscope.com/d.asp?product=GYROSTABILIZER

When it is ready, I will beg him and one of you to do some on-boat testing so we can see how well it works....it is expected to be better than an in-camera stabiliser of course and will work with anything that has a standard tripod mount.
 
Thanks MapisM; useful info. I have the canons, 10x iirc, received as a very nice present. They work on the flexible prism principle and seem to work ok when all I had previously was non-IS. I don't doubt the F's are much better. I haven't come across F's before and there are few retailers but I found the 14x for £1200 (inc uk VAT) online so there is quite some price premium http://www.binoculars-uk.co.uk/acatalog/Fujinon_Image_stablising_binoculars.html
 
Geez, that forum thread reminds of some of ours.... :D
I must admit that I've not been able to read through all of it, but fwiw my personal preference was not so much for the better clarity and/or sharper image vs. the Canons. I did read about that, but TBH when I tried them side by side (the F which I eventually bought vs. the Canons, particularly the 15x model), I wouldn't have said that the image got worse in the Canon with IS on. It's the stabilization effectiveness which imho is MUCH better in the F.
That's particularly evident when trying to follow a moving subject.
And for some reason, even more so with vertically moving subjects (I tested them looking at a fast external elevator in a very high building).
I couldn't try F & C side by side onboard, but I can't help thinking that for boating the F is bound to be significantly better.
 
Last edited:
I have the canons, 10x iirc, received as a very nice present. They work on the flexible prism principle and seem to work ok when all I had previously was non-IS.
Yep, as I said the Canon 10x is probably the best bet from a price/performance viewpoint.
And obviously, the somewhat lower stabilisation performance vs. the F is less evident at a lower magnification.
Mind, it's still in the $400+ ballpark anyway, IIRC. You've got some good friends indeed, judging by their presents... :)
 
Top