Running Hours

boatone

Well-known member
Joined
29 Jul 2001
Messages
12,845
Location
Just a few cables from Boulters Lock
www.tmba.org.uk
I keep seeing references to around 100 hours per year and its got me thinking.

A two day weekend of say 2 hours running each day would be 25 weekends to get to 100 hours. Thats roughly six months so is pretty much in line with a summer season but what about holiday cruises and the like?

I have a displacement cruiser so an hours running for me on the river is probably only 4 miles or so. I reckon to spend at least 4 hours running most days I'm out and can easily knock up over 200 hours in a season.

So is the equation one of fewer hours means more miles on planing boats or is it more complex than that?

<hr width=100% size=1><A target="_blank" HREF=http://www.boatsontheweb.com/> Website, Photo Gallery, Chat Room, Burgees</A>
 

BrendanS

Well-known member
Joined
11 Jun 2002
Messages
64,521
Location
Tesla in Space
Visit site
Difficult.

I could rack up 8 hrs getting almost nowhere on the Thames, especially Aug bank holiday when queues through locks near me could be an hour, with a queue of boats waiting in line so long that you were continually shifting in and out of gear to stay in line.

However, on a nice day, Salcombe is only 4 hours away, and that's 115 odd miles from Lymington. Nice 25-30knt cruising.

<hr width=100% size=1>Me transmitte sursum, caledoni
 

Moose

New member
Joined
1 Nov 2001
Messages
2,063
Location
West Sussex, Boat in Chichester
Visit site
I think the average lawn mower will do more hours per year than the average boat.

<hr width=100% size=1>
moosewalk.gif
 

Sunnyseeker

New member
Joined
15 Apr 2004
Messages
292
Location
Devon
Visit site
Its interesting reading the Mobo issues, we did 900 hours motoring in a year, did two oil changes, one belt, two fuel filters, she runs like a dream. Motored non stop for 50 hours at a time a couple of times. It was an 1991 Volvo43 Turbo, lovely engine.

<hr width=100% size=1>
 

oldgit

Well-known member
Joined
6 Nov 2001
Messages
28,265
Location
Medway
Visit site
Still using that 100 year old thumbnail we notice.NM

/forums/images/icons/laugh.gif

<hr width=100% size=1>Stupid place to leave an island anyway......
 

longjohnsilver

Well-known member
Joined
30 May 2001
Messages
18,841
Visit site
Re: Still using that 100 year old thumbnail we notice.NM

I thort that was his great grandson.

<hr width=100% size=1>
 

Soong

N/A
Joined
22 Feb 2004
Messages
88
Location
Kent
Visit site
I was doing the same sums in my head earlier.... I have put 60 hours on Sea Cloud in 9 months, but she has been out of the water for 3 of those (dont ask). So an average of 10 hours a month fits the profile, but then I got to thinking about hours on the boat without the engine running; that got scary.

<hr width=100% size=1>
 

chris66

Member
Joined
30 Dec 2002
Messages
61
Location
Milan / Antibes
xoomer.alice.it
Can I ask what you mean by "Also slow runnig is probably worse than fast" ?

As the proud owner of two little (very little) girls, I am often asked to chug about at 5 knots instead of going onto the plane at 16 knots +. This is fine as the med is normally very calm and some days I will motor for 2 or 3 hours at v.slow speeds. Is this l"slow runnng" likely to cause any problems?
Thanks

<hr width=100% size=1>Chris
 

Wiggo

New member
Joined
10 Sep 2003
Messages
6,021
Location
In front of the bloody computer again
Visit site
can cause bore glazing in diesels, which leads to loss of compression, poor fuel consumption, losing at cricket, rain etc etc.

<hr width=100% size=1><A target="_blank" HREF=http://homepage.ntlworld.com/graham.wignall/boats/eulimene600x800.jpg>The old and the new</A>
 

kimhollamby

Active member
Joined
16 May 2001
Messages
3,909
Location
Berkshire, Somerset, Hampshire
www.kimhollamby.com
No, only very extended times (say when you have a high horsepower turbocharged engine kept on the river for a long time). Two or three hours at a stretch (or longer) should be fine as the next time you open up it will blow any soot out and break any signs of bore glazing on the cylinder walls.

<hr width=100% size=1>
 

adarcy

New member
Joined
31 Aug 2001
Messages
844
Visit site
Re: Nitpick

Are you sure you're not confusing it with NOT running full throttle more than 10% of hours?

I agree one ought to "clear the plugs (sic) out" at least occasionally but the usual strictures about full throttle is not too much because most of the engines we talk about here are leisure rated i.e. much more powerful than the heavy duty cycle specified ones which can be run flat out all the time.

Anyway the original thought about glazing only occurs in running in new engines when it's most important not to warm up and pootle about without getting the power + turbo boost up. A run-in engine won't glaze but will, of course, benefit from an occasional blast

<hr width=100% size=1>
 
Top