Seems really easy in a flat calm, now I may be a bit of a pessimist but dont boats usually roll in really bad weather!
So.... Large swell, gale force winds, mast attached with sails fitted........??????
As he was only just able to right it without mast/sails, no way could he do it fully rigged. This test is a complete waste of time, unless of course, he has some method to loose the mast, rigging, etc quickly. Explosives?
As he was only just able to right it without mast/sails, no way could he do it fully rigged. This test is a complete waste of time, unless of course, he has some method to loose the mast, rigging, etc quickly. Explosives?
Sorry to disagree, but in a seaway bad enough to roll the boat keelside up, the odds are it will help roll it back again without cutting loose the rig, or even the trick canting stuff. Harder to right the boat in a flat calm dock than it would ever be at sea.
Quite right. I've BEEN inverted in a boat and sea movement will help righting. Once the keel was canted she came back quickly once heeled about 30 degrees. In conditions that will invert a 60-footer there wiill be more than 30 degrees movement. Also the more water that enters the hull the faster she'll right, as it reduces stability. The real danger is being trapped underwater in the cockpit. If you do manage to release your harness and swim out you then have the danger of being separated from the boat.
I'm sure you, and others, are correct about the real-life situation. But doesn't that make the harbour test a bit meaningless?
If I understand the commentary right, it was a requirement of the race organisers that this test was done. Something to do with insurance, I expect.
Surely (and based on other's experience) a better test would be to see what angle of 'tip' would be needed to self-right. It must be possible to compare with conditions that would exist at sea. Presumably if it takes less heel to self-right than it takes to capsize in the first place, then the boat is safe? Actually, I can see flaws in this argument, but there must be a sound principle here somewhere.
The conditions at sea are hugely complex and I would imagine that most knockdowns are due to breaking waves. I am not sure that we have the techniques to analyse this scenario yet. The best indication would the area between the GZ curve and the x axis which relates to the work done in attaining a given angle of heel. Hopefully these boats require substantially more energy to capsize a boat than it would to right it.
More worrying for me would be the amount of movement in that canting keel as the crane inverted the boat. The boat will never right itself if that thing came off.
I agree that a rough sea MIGHT help to right the boat but how would you know which way to cant the keel in order to take advantage of a wave helping to right you? It didn't seem a particularly quick thing to cant.