co256
Well-Known Member
I have been looking into the subject of buoyancy and will share my findings with you...
What follows is a comparison of three types of rigid foam, the standard unit for comparison is 1 cubic metre.
2 part Polyurethane liquid weight 35 kg Buoyancy 950 kg Cost £216
Plastazote LD15 weight 15 kg Buoyancy 1000 kg Cost £473
Expanded Polystyrene weight 15 kg Buoyancy 900 kg Cost £91
There was an earlier post on this subject that suggested EPS (Expanded Polystyrene) absorbs water, I have found no evidence to suggest this, in fact quite the reverse. EPS does not absorb water but it will wick moisture to less than 4% of volume, rather like GRP.
It is recommended that buoyancy is retained in watertight compartments, spread evenly around the boat and as low down as possible within the hull canoe body.
What follows is a comparison of three types of rigid foam, the standard unit for comparison is 1 cubic metre.
2 part Polyurethane liquid weight 35 kg Buoyancy 950 kg Cost £216
Plastazote LD15 weight 15 kg Buoyancy 1000 kg Cost £473
Expanded Polystyrene weight 15 kg Buoyancy 900 kg Cost £91
There was an earlier post on this subject that suggested EPS (Expanded Polystyrene) absorbs water, I have found no evidence to suggest this, in fact quite the reverse. EPS does not absorb water but it will wick moisture to less than 4% of volume, rather like GRP.
It is recommended that buoyancy is retained in watertight compartments, spread evenly around the boat and as low down as possible within the hull canoe body.
Last edited: