Red Funnel and Contessa Greylag MAIB report

Many years ago I was the only boat moored on the outer pontoon at East Cowes Marina (think it was still named "Wilmots" in those days). It was a long run of pontoon and fortunately I was at the end of it. We were sat in the cockpit having lunch when I realised a small bulk carrier, "Eileen C" had clearly misjudged leaving her adjacent berth or lost control in the wind. I just about had time to untie the lines and quickly shove the boat backwards, clear of the end of the pontoon before the ship struck the pontoon, causing considerable damage. I've no doubt had I of been asleep down below I probably wouldn't be here now. I don't think the MAIB even existed in those days but the event resonates with their stated concerns about people asleep in rafted boats amongst the presence of commercial shipping
 
It seems insane that the diagram of the ship on the chart plotter has to be switched manually depending upon which end is the bow of the boat.

It is inevitable that, one day, someone would forget to throw the switch and the chart display would show the ship back to front. It is so obvious that the switching of the chart plotter should have been done by the same switch that transferred the helm controls from one one to the other that it must have taken a very astute control designer to realise that a manual system was the way forward, so to speak. :unsure:

Richard
 
It seems insane that the diagram of the ship on the chart plotter has to be switched manually depending upon which end is the bow of the boat.

It is inevitable that, one day, someone would forget to throw the switch and the chart display would show the ship back to front. It is so obvious that the switching of the chart plotter should have been done by the same switch that transferred the helm controls from one one to the other that it must have taken a very astute control designer to realise that a manual system was the way forward, so to speak. :unsure:

Richard
Sadly Richard there is no helm control switch on this vessel. From the report it appears that the VSP controllers (longitudinal and transverse thrust) at both ends of the bridge were usually live and linked. On the day, the C/O was controlling speed from the "Southampton end" of the bridge while the helmsman was steering from the "Cowes end) of the bridge.

What the report does not mention is the limited spatial awareness offered by a digital compass readout (and digital rate of turn indicator). For me, nothing is better than an old school compass bowl for gaining an instant understanding of where Mag/True North is...
 
I know, you think he would have moved on to learning new skills and enjoying some of the last 50 years of boat design. It’s always a bit upsetting when somebody chooses not to progress.
When someone loves the boat they sail, why should they change it? Your comment would condem all sailors of X Class, Dragons, Sonatas, Contessa 32's, etc to the "not worth worrying about". I feel the owner should be commended that he kept the same boat for 40 years. Not everyone wants to sail a floating caravan in the sun like you do, many just cannot afford it. Being a hospital manager means you see all life, but your comment is a disgrace.
 
When someone loves the boat they sail, why should they change it? Your comment would condem all sailors of X Class, Dragons, Sonatas, Contessa 32's, etc to the "not worth worrying about". I feel the owner should be commended that he kept the same boat for 40 years. Not everyone wants to sail a floating caravan in the sun like you do, many just cannot afford it. Being a hospital manager means you see all life, but your comment is a disgrace.
Bit too close to home for you? I was simply agreeing with the suggestion that it was sad that he’d stuck with the same old boat since 1972 - blame that poster, not me for agreeing.
 
Last edited:
Sadly Richard there is no helm control switch on this vessel. From the report it appears that the VSP controllers (longitudinal and transverse thrust) at both ends of the bridge were usually live and linked. On the day, the C/O was controlling speed from the "Southampton end" of the bridge while the helmsman was steering from the "Cowes end) of the bridge.

What the report does not mention is the limited spatial awareness offered by a digital compass readout (and digital rate of turn indicator). For me, nothing is better than an old school compass bowl for gaining an instant understanding of where Mag/True North is...

I'm not sure that is correct but it makes no difference as if both ends can be operated at the same time by two helmsmen, potentially fighting each other, then that is clearly as ludicrous a design decision as not linking the chart plotter display to the switched helm position. :(

For £50 I could do a much better control engineering and design job than these idiots. ;)

Richard
 
Some interesting points raised in the report in terms of potential risk to other harbour users moored on the outer marina pontoons especially when rafted

I think you don’t mean “interesting” but “SCARY !” If the boat had gone the other way and smashed into rafted boats full of sleeping people, with tons of steel moving at 6 knots
 
It is so obvious that the switching of the chart plotter should have been done by the same switch that transferred the helm controls from one one to the other

"So obvious" apart from the fact that the report clearly states that both sets of controls are always active and thus there is no switch?

if both ends can be operated at the same time by two helmsmen, potentially fighting each other

Not only can be, but normally was, with the one at the leading console controlling transverse thrust on the aft rotor and the one at the trailing console controlling longitudinal thrust on both. As, again, described in the "so obvious" report.

Pete
 
Top