Piers
Well-known member
Let's assume a new boat is delivered having been epoxied before being anti-fouled. You then anti-foul every year. How often should the hull be cleaned of all anti-foul and new epoxy applied before re-anti-fouling again?
Let's assume a new boat is delivered having been epoxied before being anti-fouled. You then anti-foul every year. How often should the hull be cleaned of all anti-foul and new epoxy applied before re-anti-fouling again?
Interesting question Piers. I guess for most people the answer would be never.
Hi LJS. I'm told that no epoxy manufacturer will guarantee their products for more then 5 years, albeit their products may actually last for ten provided they've been applied correctly. Hence, boats should be checked every 5 years for moisture content, and if necessary, taken back to the epoxy to see its state. If OK, re-epoxied, but if not OK, the old epoxy removed and new applied.
I suspect the industry is still learning, but it also poses the question if manufacturers are advising their customers accordingly.
if it aint broke dont fix it piers. Taking epoxy off is a very difficult job. It cannot be taken off with an abrasive blast as it is harder than the gelcoat underneath. Sanding off is a huge job and will, to an extent, damage your boat. Epoxy is waterproof and stays that way. It doesn't spontaneously degrade at the end of a warantee. If it isn't flaking off, leave well alone. If it is flaking off and it is localised, repair that bit.
As for removing the antifoul the average is i reckon every 7 years. If you have a solvented epoxy system it will have had 6 layers of contrasting colours, with a dry film thickness of about 45 microns per coat. After antifoul removal if it is done well, you will be left with a green grey mottle, showing the blast will have removed on average about 45 microns of your 300 or so microns of epoxy. One coat of solvent free over the top before re antifouling would therefore put you back to the thickness you started with. Most people don't bother as 250 microns of epoxy is left after all.
You don't need to remove the antifoul to measure the moisture content of the hull by the way.
Out of interest, if the epoxy can be patch-repaired as mentioned, would it be practical to key the whole hull and re-epoxy over the first treatment? Weight might be a factor with lighter boats but perhaps the difference would be marginal for something like a Fleming 55?
Out of interest, if the epoxy can be patch-repaired as mentioned, would it be practical to key the whole hull and re-epoxy over the first treatment? Weight might be a factor with lighter boats but perhaps the difference would be marginal for something like a Fleming 55?
That's exactly what we did last spring before applying coppercoat. As long as the previous epoxy layer is keyed, ie lightly sanded, I can't see any problems in putting new layers on, as long as the hull is dry.
But it was a thought provoking matter that's started me thinking.
Most manufacturers view the gel coated hull as the finished product, providing it lasts the warranty period, that is all their worried about.
Abrade, an epoxy tie coat and two coats of Antifouling is an extra ( most manufacturers, dealers don't use an epoxy tie coat)
Abrade seven coats of epoxy and two coats antifouling is most definitely and extra. Epoxy coating a hull like this is an expensive extra in most peoples minds.
Antifouling is rarely scraped off or abrasive blasted off on a boat under 10 years.
Moisture levels are only normally taken on a sale survey or when one suspects a problem.
After 10 years to lift a boat, abrasive blast to remove antifouling, fill any voids, sand any areas requiring it, patch prime then 6 or seven coats of epoxy and two costs of antifouling is viewed as very expensive.