Ratings war

[jimi]

I've been thinking. There have been tacit suggestions that any capital made on the flotation of the forum should be divided amongst posters on the basis of the total number of posts or the number of ID's. This is totally unfair and really does not reflect the added value that the poster has contributed. I propose that Kim sets up a scorecard based on the scrabble scores of the letters used in the posts. This I fqzeel wqill reflezct ze added valque muqh moze aquarately.

<hr width=100% size=1>

 

[Aeolus_IV]

Its not volume we want but quality, so I'd suggest working out the average scrabble word score for each forumites post, just to make it interesting...

Jeff.

<hr width=100% size=1>

 

[Twister_Ken]

Unfair to those of us who don't live or sail in Zummerzet.

<hr width=100% size=1><A target="_blank" HREF=http://www.writeforweb.com/twister1>Let's Twist Again</A>

 

[tcm]

Re: Carpet bagging

Completely disagree.

First off there is precedent here. The precedent being North sea oil. So, that's all the Scots out for starters.

Second the basis would obviousl be on the number of amount time and number of words posted. Cos after all, nobody in any company is judged on the basis of quality, and T Blair isd seen as v succesful simply becos lasted 6 years, not becos he has done much.

Anyway, are we going to launch a hostile takeover then? I love the sound of those, it always sounds as if there's a fight in the staff car park. Probly true.

<hr width=100% size=1>

 

[Ohdrat]

so wheeeeuure doz thiiiiiiiz leeeeeeavfffffe foruuuuumytes with dissslexxxxxxxxyyyyia?

<hr width=100% size=1>

 

[jimi]

minding their z's and q's!

<hr width=100% size=1>