Rabbits

Wansworth

Well-known member
Joined
8 May 2003
Messages
33,023
Location
SPAIN,Galicia
Visit site
Worked on a crappy dredger a good many years ago and what could be called the induction speech by the captain was not to mention rabbits on the ship ,and he was really serious.Apparently really bad luck would follow.Well the captain was a bit odd and rana tight ship,two mess decks left the deckhands,me an Australian student in a spacious dinning room whilst the “officers” all four cramped up in theirs.The worrying bit was if the ship had to go anywhere outside the Solent the Captainhid in his cabin till we arrived.The only properly sane officer was the 1st who knew about navigation,thank god.
 

RunAgroundHard

Well-known member
Joined
20 Aug 2022
Messages
2,240
Visit site
Think it’s something to do with a superstition that the Devil may come on board disguised as a rabbit, Why a rabbit?

It is to do with pagans celebrating procreation and fertility through rabbit symbolism. On vessels it is puritan in nature as pagan celebrations transferred to christian celebration, such as easter, is rejected by by many christians that have a more pure belief in christianity. Hence, the rabbit being rejected as a discussion topic on a vessel. It's hypocracity considering the amount of sodomy that was probably going on in the old merchant navy.
 

Slowboat35

Well-known member
Joined
4 Apr 2020
Messages
2,610
Visit site
Rabbits make holes, and holes are bad news on ships?
I've heard it said thet the French get around this restriction by calling them 'polop polop', apparently an onomatopoeic reference to the way they move. Is this so?

Priests and women are also said to be bad news on board. Priests because they worship the wrong God and no sailor would dare risk offending Lord Neptune. Women? Likely to cause strife among jealous sailors? Who knows?
 

jamie N

Well-known member
Joined
20 Dec 2012
Messages
6,273
Location
Fortrose
Visit site
The version that I've matured with, and still refrain from, is that concerning "Green Rabbits", of which the very mention will augur great ill fortune.
To this day, I respect it, despite having never encountered a situation where the utterance of "Green Rabbits" could ever be contemplated or seen as rational?
 

peter bush

Member
Joined
14 Sep 2009
Messages
80
Visit site
I have heard about not mentioning rabbits on Portland. It was something about a warren collapsing a cliff face on to a miners canteen whist they were all in having their midday meal break.
 

Poignard

Well-known member
Joined
23 Jul 2005
Messages
53,001
Location
South London
Visit site
"RABBITS
Naval slang name given to articles taken, or intended to be taken, ashore
privately. Originally "rabbits" were things taken ashore improperly (i.e.
theft or smuggling - the name arose from the ease with which tobacco, etc.,
could be concealed in the inside of a dead rabbit) but with the passenger of
time the application of the word has spread to anything taken ashore; an air
of impropriety nevertheless still hangs over the use of the word, whether or
not this is justified (it seldom is). Hence the phrase "Tuck its ears in",
often said to an officer or rating seen going ashore with a parcel.
"

Royal Navy Diction & Slang

I remember the term 'rabbits' also covered little private jobs done for yourself, or others, using naval facilities and materials.
 

R.Ems

Active member
Joined
1 Apr 2022
Messages
354
Visit site
It is to do with pagans celebrating procreation and fertility through rabbit symbolism. On vessels it is puritan in nature as pagan celebrations transferred to christian celebration, such as easter, is rejected by by many christians that have a more pure belief in christianity. Hence, the rabbit being rejected as a discussion topic on a vessel. It's hypocracity considering the amount of sodomy that was probably going on in the old merchant navy.
Why, do you think more men were 'gay' back then? or do you hold the view that the Merch was a magnet for those wiith such persuasions? (I have nothiing against it myself)
 

RunAgroundHard

Well-known member
Joined
20 Aug 2022
Messages
2,240
Visit site
Why, do you think more men were 'gay' back then? or do you hold the view that the Merch was a magnet for those wiith such persuasions? (I have nothiing against it myself)

Not sure what you are suggesting, I have not mentioned "gay" or homosexuality, just sodomy. I think you are looking for a problem to complain about, where none exists.
 

Chiara’s slave

Well-known member
Joined
14 Apr 2022
Messages
7,609
Location
Western Solent
Visit site
Not sure what you are suggesting, I have not mentioned "gay" or homosexuality, just sodomy. I think you are looking for a problem to complain about, where none exists.
Straight men don’t do that to each other. We call men who have sex with men ‘gay’ or ‘homosexual’. Possibly bisexual I guess. Hopefully with no rancour, it’s no big deal.
 

oldharry

Well-known member
Joined
30 May 2001
Messages
9,942
Location
North from the Nab about 10 miles
Visit site
Brittany Ferries Sy Malo ferry, Bretagne a few years back: I needed some fresh Duracell batteries so I applied to the onboard shop. "oh no sir, we can't sell those aboard".

Me: "why ever not?"

"It's the crew sir, they are mostly Bretons. They would refuse to sail because of the Duracell rabbit logo"

Apparently this actually happened when the deck crew discovered the rabbit logo, and the entire stock had to be taken ashore before the crew would work the ship! That , in the late 20th century....!!!
 

Slowboat35

Well-known member
Joined
4 Apr 2020
Messages
2,610
Visit site
Chiara, I think not. In those days sailors - "Jolly Jack" - were often considered/depicted as "gay", that is "gay" in it's true sense; happy, carefree. Nothing to do with being homos.

I wonder what credible evidence there is for homosexuality being common, leave alone rife in those days? In a society where such behaviour was considered utterly beyond the pale to the point that it was a capital crime I find it hard to imagine that it was anywhere near as prevalent as many modern commentators (often, if not usually with axes to grind , as it were) like to claim.
The modern Royal Navy pre lumpy-jumpers suffered little from this though even their view of the RFA and the Merchant Navy is not as kind.

Has there ever been a credible study done of this?
 
Last edited:

wully1

Well-known member
Joined
27 Aug 2002
Messages
2,840
Location
west coast of Scotland
Visit site
Superstition and religion (a really crap superstition) are banned on my Fyne shup.

Well not really…You can talk about them if you like but standby for some piss taking if your serious about them. But since I don’t hang out with god -botherers or Woo nutters it’s unlikely you’d be aboard in any case.
 
Top