alt
Well-Known Member
When we were without the supercharger for a while (see the posts about my friends belts snapping on his KAD43) last week we were nervous and kept the revs below 1500 incase the engine got cranky by not picking up boost from the supercharger.
However after a while we said we'd give it a try, and we upped the revs. The engine didn't cough, spit or get angry. The only difference, was obviously, that the acceleration wasn't as good. But revs went up to cruising range no prob, and even a quick blast at WOT
I often find the supercharger a little annoying when trying to do slow speeds, and next summer I'll be doing slow speeds for quite a while when on long rivers with speed limits
My question is, would you do any harm removing the supercharger belt and just running with the turbo? Or is the engine 'brain' picking up something bad when there's no supercharger boost?
(Note the supercharger wires are still connected, just the belt disconnected)
The only thing I can think of is that with the clutch engaged between 1700rpm - 2*00rpm it might like not the fact that it's not moving? But don't see how this could do any damage?
However after a while we said we'd give it a try, and we upped the revs. The engine didn't cough, spit or get angry. The only difference, was obviously, that the acceleration wasn't as good. But revs went up to cruising range no prob, and even a quick blast at WOT
I often find the supercharger a little annoying when trying to do slow speeds, and next summer I'll be doing slow speeds for quite a while when on long rivers with speed limits
My question is, would you do any harm removing the supercharger belt and just running with the turbo? Or is the engine 'brain' picking up something bad when there's no supercharger boost?
(Note the supercharger wires are still connected, just the belt disconnected)
The only thing I can think of is that with the clutch engaged between 1700rpm - 2*00rpm it might like not the fact that it's not moving? But don't see how this could do any damage?