Queen Mary 2

paulrossall

New member
Joined
22 Oct 2001
Messages
1,058
Visit site
To post a hyperlink you need to look in the help section.
<A target="_blank" HREF=http://www.blue-hound.com/P0001307.JPG>http://www.blue-hound.com/P0001307.JPG</A>
Hope this helps. Paul

<hr width=100% size=1>
 

Rowana

Two steps lower than the ships' cat
Joined
17 Apr 2002
Messages
6,132
Location
NE Scotland
Visit site
I\'m old enough . .

. . to remember seeing both the original Queens (Mary & Elizabeth) while doing my bit on a minesweeper out of Pompey!

God, I must be old ! !

Anyone else remember them??

<hr width=100% size=1>
 

halcyon

Well-known member
Joined
20 Apr 2002
Messages
10,767
Location
Cornwall
Visit site
Re: I\'m old enough . .

What the Queens ? or the days when we used to be build them ?


Brian

<hr width=100% size=1>
 

TheBoatman

New member
Joined
12 Nov 2002
Messages
3,168
Location
Kent
Visit site
I wonder if she will make it to the other side without prop vibration, engine failure, etc.
IMHO most new boats seem to take a couple of trips to shake the gremlins out.

We will have to wait and see?

<hr width=100% size=1>
 

BrendanS

Well-known member
Joined
11 Jun 2002
Messages
64,521
Location
Tesla in Space
Visit site
Isn't that why they took her down to Spain before coming here? Shake down cruise, and let crew get used to her.

<hr width=100% size=1> I asked an economist for her phone number....and she gave me an estimate
 

anthonyyearsley

New member
Joined
14 Aug 2001
Messages
14
Location
Solihull
Visit site
Does anyone have comparative figures for QM2 against QM1? I have only seen gross tonnage, i.e.volume, 150,000 tons and length 1132 feet. QM1 was 81200 gross tons, 90000 tons displacement, length 1018 feet, beam 118 feet and draft 39 feet. Although the QM2 is said to be the beamiest ever it could be that the displacement is no greater.

<hr width=100% size=1>
 

Mirelle

N/A
Joined
30 Nov 2002
Messages
4,531
Visit site
Ive got a paper given by her cheif designer somewhere. But I'm pretty sure she is heavier, because one factor given for the chosen size was the wish to avoid using aluminuim alloys in the superstructure. QE2 has them and has fatigue problems; QM2 is all steel.

<hr width=100% size=1>Que scais-je?
 

petery

New member
Joined
9 Jul 2002
Messages
496
Location
Boat in Redon, France
Visit site
I worked on the Canberra in the winter of 1962 and watched it's aluminium superstructure flex in a Force 12 in the Bay of Biscay; popping out the promenade deck windows! At least she was Belfast-built.

QM2 - built in France, owned by the Americans, I believe, and sails under the Red Ensign as a marketing 'flag of convenience' ?

<hr width=100% size=1>
 
Top