lustyd
Well-Known Member
Of course the leak is to earth, my point was it’s not always through the earth wire in dangerous situations so the RCD doesn’t play with that wire.
I have had a look at the sales pitch and also another GI producer. Who copied from whom? Just a lot of smoke and mirrors. They don't tell untruths but a lot left to misinterpretation. I think the term Galvanic when applied to protection is just a wide catch which include s Electrolytic, probably for the layman's benefit.Yes, but more often than not it's a leak to Earth that causes the imbalance, in which case the warning light on the GI will illuminate, or it would if there was no RCD.
I don't like products where they waffle about so called benefits, that aren't actually benefits in the real World.
>
A GI will not prevent or protect against electric shock . Neither will it have any effect on the operation of safety devices such as RCD's or MCB's. It will not prevent Galvanic action, Electrolytic yes .
>
The 18th edition regs. only allow, on installation, leakage of less than 30% of the protective device. i.e. a system protected by a 30 Ma RCD can only have 9Ma max. leakage.
Sorry if that is a bit long winded. first couple of lines are the important bit.
Other way round
A galvanic isolator will protect against galvanic action ( ie that caused by dissimilar metals ), It will not protect against electrolytic action caused by leakage from higher voltage sources.
mA
.