awyatybw
Well-Known Member
I own a Victoria 34. She has a teak deck. This is laid on top of the foam-cored fiberglass deck and was an optional extra when she was new (to a previous owner) in 1993. That is, it is largely cosmetic, although some form of non-slip surface is clearly required.
It is fixed by the planks being glued to the GRP deck, I think with some form of epoxy. It has been suggested that there nonetheless may be some screw-holes in the underlying deck caused by the fixing of the jigs used to bend the planks and hold the deck in place as it was fitted. If anyone is familiar with the specific techniques used by Victoria Yachts during the relevant period (which was after the main period of building Victoria 34s) and can supply further details then I should be obliged.
The deck is worn out and needs to be replaced. The "caulking", which was renewed by Victoria Yacht Services in 2001, has failed in many places and a good number of the planks have started to lift (Victoria Yacht Services was one of the successor companies to Victoria Yachts, and they went into liquidation a few weeks after completing the work on our boat). I have patched it up such that it will last this season, I hope, but I plan to have it completely renewed next winter.
I know that there are many who would advise use of Tredmaster or similar, or even Tek-Dek. For the moment, however, I am minded to replace it with a new teak deck of some description. I am fortunate to be based in Kiel (for the present) which is pretty much in the centre of the wooden boat-building world. So far I have obtained two quotes for the work, using quite different techniques.
(a) A traditional build of a teak deck, using 42 x 12mm teak planks. The planks would be screwed into the underlying GRP deck. They would extend all the way to the toerail, rather than leaving a c.100mm 'gutter' as at present.
(b) A deck built using max 6mm teak planking glued to underlying panels of plywood. These panels would be fixed to the GRP deck with either epoxy or a Sikaflex adhesive. This technique has the clear advantage that no screws are required into the GRP deck.
I would appreciate any advice, suggestions or observations about these options including any experience others may have had of either technique, good or bad.
Alan.
It is fixed by the planks being glued to the GRP deck, I think with some form of epoxy. It has been suggested that there nonetheless may be some screw-holes in the underlying deck caused by the fixing of the jigs used to bend the planks and hold the deck in place as it was fitted. If anyone is familiar with the specific techniques used by Victoria Yachts during the relevant period (which was after the main period of building Victoria 34s) and can supply further details then I should be obliged.
The deck is worn out and needs to be replaced. The "caulking", which was renewed by Victoria Yacht Services in 2001, has failed in many places and a good number of the planks have started to lift (Victoria Yacht Services was one of the successor companies to Victoria Yachts, and they went into liquidation a few weeks after completing the work on our boat). I have patched it up such that it will last this season, I hope, but I plan to have it completely renewed next winter.
I know that there are many who would advise use of Tredmaster or similar, or even Tek-Dek. For the moment, however, I am minded to replace it with a new teak deck of some description. I am fortunate to be based in Kiel (for the present) which is pretty much in the centre of the wooden boat-building world. So far I have obtained two quotes for the work, using quite different techniques.
(a) A traditional build of a teak deck, using 42 x 12mm teak planks. The planks would be screwed into the underlying GRP deck. They would extend all the way to the toerail, rather than leaving a c.100mm 'gutter' as at present.
(b) A deck built using max 6mm teak planking glued to underlying panels of plywood. These panels would be fixed to the GRP deck with either epoxy or a Sikaflex adhesive. This technique has the clear advantage that no screws are required into the GRP deck.
I would appreciate any advice, suggestions or observations about these options including any experience others may have had of either technique, good or bad.
Alan.