Greenheart
Well-Known Member
I seem to remember reading a good oar-thread hereabouts in the last year...I may even have initiated it...but I can't find it.
I've generally found oars to be less flawed than rowlocks, or the mechanisms that secure the rowlocks, or fail to do so...
...but equally, I've often felt that each sweep was ill-proportioned to the size of the boat, and that my effort might have been more beneficially-geared, using longer oars to drag through more water, shifting the boat further.
Then again, that may be nonsense. But if so, why wouldn't Britain's finest at Eton Dorney have used the same kit we do?
Is there a tried, tested, proven reason why oars aren't usually more than 6' long, other than the impracticality of storage?
I've generally found oars to be less flawed than rowlocks, or the mechanisms that secure the rowlocks, or fail to do so...
...but equally, I've often felt that each sweep was ill-proportioned to the size of the boat, and that my effort might have been more beneficially-geared, using longer oars to drag through more water, shifting the boat further.
Then again, that may be nonsense. But if so, why wouldn't Britain's finest at Eton Dorney have used the same kit we do?
Is there a tried, tested, proven reason why oars aren't usually more than 6' long, other than the impracticality of storage?