tillergirl
Well-Known Member
Permanent
1. Further reductions in depth at the Long Sand Head. Usefully UKHO have published two replacements blocs, one for chart 1975 (Thames Estuary North) and one for Chart 2692 (Sunk Inner Precautionary Area). the one for chart 2692 is well worth printing if you go round 'the Head'
2. Some slight reductions in depths off Old Leigh - all visible from Roger's house. None really should be too much trouble as they are in the 3 to 5m range.
Temporary
1. As posted elsewhere, Harwich have ploughed the Yacht track by the Inner Ridge and Deane buoys and the depth at the spot quoted is 3.2m. Yes, the notice is still ambiguous in wording but I have rung them and they confirmed the depth of water at LAT at that point is 3.2m Go old Harwich for ploughing it.
2. Work at the London Array is all in-field cable burying and surveying with the THV Galatea removing generators from completed turbines.
3. PLA have published restrictions on the navigation of Bow Creek.
That's it.
1. Further reductions in depth at the Long Sand Head. Usefully UKHO have published two replacements blocs, one for chart 1975 (Thames Estuary North) and one for Chart 2692 (Sunk Inner Precautionary Area). the one for chart 2692 is well worth printing if you go round 'the Head'
2. Some slight reductions in depths off Old Leigh - all visible from Roger's house. None really should be too much trouble as they are in the 3 to 5m range.
Temporary
1. As posted elsewhere, Harwich have ploughed the Yacht track by the Inner Ridge and Deane buoys and the depth at the spot quoted is 3.2m. Yes, the notice is still ambiguous in wording but I have rung them and they confirmed the depth of water at LAT at that point is 3.2m Go old Harwich for ploughing it.
2. Work at the London Array is all in-field cable burying and surveying with the THV Galatea removing generators from completed turbines.
3. PLA have published restrictions on the navigation of Bow Creek.
That's it.
