skyflyer
Active member
I have a feeling this could be like anchors - 6 people answer and we get 7 opinions - but I'd still like to hear all seven - or more!
Our 170aH leisure battery has died over the winter (doesn't hold charge for more than a few hours, dropping form 13v to 9.5v) ; it was last replaced in 2009 and as the boat is shared by three of us it gets pretty heavy use every season so I am not too concerned about that; time to replace it.
So - conscious of a bit of brouhaha about different types I try and do some research and am so far ending up with a lot of conflicting advice.
I read a piece, first, on the Stirling website; Stirling is quite adamant that a so called 'leisure battery' is nothing of the sort and that gel and maintenance free batteries create more problems than they solve. His advice - by a standard battery with the ability to top up the electrolyte.
Then i did some more research and find the exact opposite opinion!
Given the difference between a basic battery (~£120) and a 'top of the range (~£620), I'd like to know exactly what one supposedly gets for the money. If a better battery lasts longer but requires a very specific charging regime then I'm not sure I'm not simply better off spending £120 every couple of years rather than £620 and then killing it through improper maintenance?
In short - I am leaning towards the lower end of the range and wanted to know if anyone has a good reason not to do this?
Then theres the question of maintenance free or a conventional battery with unscrewable plugs to top up. Are they a no-no on the boat - does acid go everywhere if you are heeled over with the toe-rail in the water?
Final supplementary question - our electric set up is the 1-2-Both-Off with just two batteries so the leisure battery CAN be used for starting. Is this a good idea or not?
Thanks, as always, for the variety of opinions on this!
Our 170aH leisure battery has died over the winter (doesn't hold charge for more than a few hours, dropping form 13v to 9.5v) ; it was last replaced in 2009 and as the boat is shared by three of us it gets pretty heavy use every season so I am not too concerned about that; time to replace it.
So - conscious of a bit of brouhaha about different types I try and do some research and am so far ending up with a lot of conflicting advice.
I read a piece, first, on the Stirling website; Stirling is quite adamant that a so called 'leisure battery' is nothing of the sort and that gel and maintenance free batteries create more problems than they solve. His advice - by a standard battery with the ability to top up the electrolyte.
Then i did some more research and find the exact opposite opinion!
Given the difference between a basic battery (~£120) and a 'top of the range (~£620), I'd like to know exactly what one supposedly gets for the money. If a better battery lasts longer but requires a very specific charging regime then I'm not sure I'm not simply better off spending £120 every couple of years rather than £620 and then killing it through improper maintenance?
In short - I am leaning towards the lower end of the range and wanted to know if anyone has a good reason not to do this?
Then theres the question of maintenance free or a conventional battery with unscrewable plugs to top up. Are they a no-no on the boat - does acid go everywhere if you are heeled over with the toe-rail in the water?
Final supplementary question - our electric set up is the 1-2-Both-Off with just two batteries so the leisure battery CAN be used for starting. Is this a good idea or not?
Thanks, as always, for the variety of opinions on this!