More legislation pt 2

ShipsWoofy

New member
Joined
10 Sep 2004
Messages
10,431
Visit site
Consultation; released 2310 on 09 Dec 2004

The purpose of this consultation is to elicit views about the common persons in the United Kingdom at this time having what has historically become known as fun. It is deemed for purposes of this consultation that the term fun can also be attributed as a person enjoying a social event either by participation or spectation of said event.

It is also noted that during our research we found persons actually smiling in the United Kingdom, people from the age of about three weeks old upwards. As it is unknown quantifiably what a three week old baby has to smile about, for purposes of this consultation a lower age level of six weeks old will be stated.

It has been levied that anyone having ‘fun’ at any time in the United Kingdom and any of her territories will be subject to a ‘fun levy’.

We have categorised the allowance levels following;

Ultra Rate; Comedians and entertainers.

Top Rate; Being involved in any type of activity that brings personal pleasure, including sex. Examples such as field sports, sailing, climbing and leisure walking.

Middle Rate; playing games and chatting to friends and colleagues on non necessary topics. Telling a joke during a conversation would immediately move that person into the ultra category whether it was funny or not. Reality television participants will not be subject to fun levies for obvious reasons.

Bottom Rate; Using the internet for social purposes, being an old git and sitting in your car at places of beauty rather than getting out, writing stupid odes in order to find a cheap laugh.

Exemptions; School cross country running, any American comedies, conversations about col regs.

The reason the Government feel the need to control unlicensed fun is obviously to combat terrorism, or anarchy or hell we just think you should be bloody miserable ok.

Consultation invites responses from everyone who feels they will be affected by the fun 'tax' er levy, though we wont take a blind bit of notice. Responses must be received at the address below by 2311 on 09 Dec 2004

www.we screwedyou.gov.uk


<hr width=100% size=1><A target="_blank" HREF=http://www.topcatsail.co.uk>
w.jpg
</A>
 

MrG

New member
Joined
30 Jul 2003
Messages
115
Location
Medstead,Hampshire
Visit site
Now I'm guessing that if we all become so miserable that the levy won't be bringing in enough, so will that mean we'll have government people standing on corners trying to make us laugh out loud, then taxing us immediately?

<hr width=100% size=1><font color=blue>Regards Mark
 

Parsonsheath

Active member
Joined
7 Jul 2003
Messages
2,938
Location
Essex
Visit site
Thought you really sounded good till you invited responses, then it was just lame.

Come on, we all know that the minister involved will have set the questions and answers, then appointed someone in thrall to him to carry out an independcent review in those presise terms, for security purposes all this will be strictly private, and then ignored because it gets in the way of decision making.

The results (or guesses as to the results) will be leaked to various contacts in the press to test the temperature, and Hodge will make another statement about how important it is they come into our sad little homes to direct and assist us to lead more rich and fulfilling lives

Then they will forget that and think up something new to prove they are bright and out there, and why don't we all love them anymore!!

Next tax please.

<hr width=100% size=1>
 

BrendanS

Well-known member
Joined
11 Jun 2002
Messages
64,521
Location
Tesla in Space
Visit site
You haven't read the orig post on which this spoof is based then, as it does indeed have a consultation document to which responses are invited

<hr width=100% size=1>Me transmitte sursum, caledoni
 
Top