carlton
Well-Known Member
Re: MAIB Roasted over \'dodgy dossier\'
That's true - yet I've a terrible feeling that they have an agenda.
That's true - yet I've a terrible feeling that they have an agenda.
MAIB Roasted
- Thread starter tome
- Start date
Andrew_Fanner
Well-Known Member
Re: MAIB Roasted over \'dodgy dossier\'
£600: someone went down to a local sillysitter and asked how much for a couple of hour's work looking out a report.
Pity they question was asked in Central London rather than, say, Whitehaven, Ventnor or Wallsend, to guess at places with less pricey legal types.
£600: someone went down to a local sillysitter and asked how much for a couple of hour's work looking out a report.
Pity they question was asked in Central London rather than, say, Whitehaven, Ventnor or Wallsend, to guess at places with less pricey legal types.
tome
Well-Known Member
Re: MAIB Roasted over \'dodgy dossier\'
[ QUOTE ]
Unless you're suggesting that we examine the excel spreadsheet and 1162 of us request further information on each individual "incident" ?
[/ QUOTE ]
That was more or less what I had in mind, but start with the spreadsheet and see where it takes us. I sent the following to MAIB
Exercising my right under the Freedom of Information Act 2000 I would like to request the following document which the Information Commissioner states on record that you already hold, namely:
The numerical log data held as an Excel spreadsheet
This was your numerical log on which subsequent statistics were published regarding leisure craft incidents in the 2005 MAIB Annual report
The document I require is referenced in the IOC Decision Notice FS50125936 dated 21 November 2006 in paragraph 19 under the heading of Chronology
The spreadsheet is documented as already existing, which is fortunate for all in terms of the cost limits under the FOI Act
Regards
I had the following response today:
Thank you for your e-mail dated 18/01/2007. The MAIB are dealing with it under the terms of the Freedom of Information Act 2000. We are currently reviewing our records and will reply within 20 working days from the date of your e-mail. In the meantime, should you require any further assistance please do not hesitate to contact me.
Kind regards
[ QUOTE ]
Unless you're suggesting that we examine the excel spreadsheet and 1162 of us request further information on each individual "incident" ?
[/ QUOTE ]
That was more or less what I had in mind, but start with the spreadsheet and see where it takes us. I sent the following to MAIB
Exercising my right under the Freedom of Information Act 2000 I would like to request the following document which the Information Commissioner states on record that you already hold, namely:
The numerical log data held as an Excel spreadsheet
This was your numerical log on which subsequent statistics were published regarding leisure craft incidents in the 2005 MAIB Annual report
The document I require is referenced in the IOC Decision Notice FS50125936 dated 21 November 2006 in paragraph 19 under the heading of Chronology
The spreadsheet is documented as already existing, which is fortunate for all in terms of the cost limits under the FOI Act
Regards
I had the following response today:
Thank you for your e-mail dated 18/01/2007. The MAIB are dealing with it under the terms of the Freedom of Information Act 2000. We are currently reviewing our records and will reply within 20 working days from the date of your e-mail. In the meantime, should you require any further assistance please do not hesitate to contact me.
Kind regards
rickp
Well-Known Member
Re: MAIB Roasted over \'dodgy dossier\'
Did you get a response to this Tom?
Rick
Did you get a response to this Tom?
Rick
tome
Well-Known Member
Re: MAIB Roasted over \'dodgy dossier\'
Yes, I published the spreadsheet which they sent me under FOI Act
Yes, I published the spreadsheet which they sent me under FOI Act